![]() |
Executive Summary: “Relative Deprivation, Poor Health Habits and Mortality” by Christine Eibner and William N. EvansBeginning
in the early 1990s, a number of authors began to detect a strong statistical
link between income inequality and measures of group health. Cross-country and
cross-state models found that areas with higher income inequalities tended to
have higher mortality and poorer measures of health status. This work has since
been widely criticized and a number of more recent studies leave the
inequality/healthy hypothesis in doubt. Authors of the original studies referenced above
argued that the statistical relationship between income and mortality was due
in part to the impact of “relative deprivation” which argues that individuals
are adversely affected when they perceive themselves to be economically
deprived relative to their peers. These papers hypothesize that relative
deprivation influences health primarily through psychosocial pathways. Individuals
who feel they are economically disadvantaged compared to their peers may be
depressed and disgruntled, conditions that affect health both directly (via
heart disease, high blood pressure, and suicide) and indirectly (via increased
smoking, poor eating habits, and alcohol abuse). What’s interesting about the appeals to relative
deprivation in the context of the income inequality/health literature is that
inequality and relative deprivation are two fundamentally different phenomena. Clearly
these two variables are related, but income inequality is a group measure while
relative deprivation is specific to the individual. Two people living in the
same state or country are exposed to the same measure of group inequality, yet
these two people can have vastly different measures of relative deprivation. Although recent studies cast doubt on the
relationship between income inequality and health, to date, few studies look
specifically at the relative deprivation hypothesis. In this paper, we use
detailed data at the individual level to test directly whether measures of
relative deprivation are predictive of poor health. In the first part of this paper, we use
restricted-use micro-level data from the National Health Interview Survey
Multiple Cause of Death Files (NHIS/MCOD) to investigate the relative
deprivation/mortality link. We focus exclusively on males aged 21-64, and our
primary measure of relative deprivation is based on work by Yitzhaki. This
measure takes into consideration not only a respondent’s percentile rank in
income within their reference group but also the average incomes of people who
make more than the respondent. We define reference groups using a combination
of characteristics including state of residence, age, race, and education. Our results indicate that, even after controlling
for reference group effects and individual income, relative deprivation is
positively associated with an individual’s probability of death. Relative
deprivation is also positively linked to cause-specific mortality, notably for
deaths due to tobacco-related cancers and coronary heart disease (CHD). In the
second part of this paper, we use data from the National Health Interview
Survey (NHIS) and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) to
explore whether relative deprivation is associated with morbidity and health-compromising
behavior. Using a number of outcomes including self-reported health status,
limited activity days, smoking, seatbelt use, body mass index, and propensity
to exercise, we find that relative deprivation in the sense of Yitzhaki is
consistently linked to the probability that an individual engages is in
poor health and engages in risky behaviors.
|
||||||
Russell Sage Foundation 112 East 64th Street New York, NY 10065
|