![]() |
Executive Summary: “Who Gets an Early Education? Family Income and the Enrollment of 3- to 5-Year-Olds from 1968 to 2000” by Jay Bainbridge, Marcia Meyers, Sakiko Tanaka, and Jane WaldfogelHas inequality in access to early education been growing or lessening over time? Using
the October Current Population Survey education supplement from 1968 to
2000, we look at 3-, 4- and 5-year-olds’ enrollment in early education
— including center-based care, Head Start, nursery school,
pre-kindergarten, and kindergarten. Our
analysis shows a strong link between family income and early education
enrollment for 3- and 4-year-olds, especially when we compare the
bottom two and the top two income groups. These
differences remain even after controlling for a large variety of
factors, including race/ethnicity, maternal employment, family
structure, and parental education. Inequality
in early education by income group varies by age of child: it is most
pronounced for 3-year-olds, who have been the least likely to benefit
from public early childhood education programs; it has diminished in
the past decade for 4-year-olds, who have been increasingly likely to
have access to public pre-kindergarten programs; and it has all but
disappeared for the 5-year-olds, who now largely attend public
kindergarten. This pattern suggests a
potentially important role for public policy in closing the gap in
early education between children of different income groups. To
what extent should we be concerned that 3 and 4 year old children from
lower-income families are less likely to be enrolled in early education? We need to be careful in drawing strong conclusions here. Knowing
that a child is enrolled in “school” says nothing about the quality of
care children receive in that setting, nor about the counterfactual of
what they would be receiving at home or in a non-school child care
setting. Yet, we think some concern is warranted. There
is a sizeable literature that suggests that, all else equal, children
who have attended pre-school enter school more ready to learn. Moreover,
to the extent that higher-income families use their additional income
to enroll their pre-schoolers in an early education program, we may
infer that these programs are a valuable commodity. If
it is of value, the fact that children from higher income families, and
families with more educated parents, are more likely to receive it, is
particularly concerning. Children from low
income or less educated, families may be “doubly disadvantaged” – less
likely to benefit from resources that promote school readiness at home
and less likely to benefit from being enrolled in educationally
oriented pre-school programs outside the home.
|
||||||
Russell Sage Foundation 112 East 64th Street New York, NY 10065
|