Skip to main content
The US Deportation System and Its Aftermath
Books

RSF: The US Deportation System and Its Aftermath

Editors
Caitlin Patler
Bradford Jones
Paperback
$29.95
Add to Cart
Publication Date
7 in. × 10 in. 244 pages
ISBN
978-0-87154-835-1

About This Book

DOWNLOAD A FREE DIGITAL COPY

The United States is home to the largest deportation system in the world. Between 2001 and 2022, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) carried out nearly 6.5 million deportations. Deportation is often framed as a singular event that happens to an individual. However, as public policy scholar Caitlin Patler and political scientist Bradford Jones argue in this issue of RSF, deportation is a system that encompasses premigration, within-U.S., and post-deportation contexts and outcomes. With Congress recently approving a massive expansion of the U.S. deportation system, understanding its consequences is more important than ever before.

In this issue, an interdisciplinary group of contributors explore the wide range of impacts of the U.S. deportation system. The introduction by Patler and Jones defines the U.S. deportation system and provides a comprehensive historical context for understanding its causes and consequences. Mass deportation is enabled primarily through the merging of U.S. immigration and criminal laws. Ian Peacock explores the proliferation of 287(g) agreements, which deputize local law enforcement to enforce immigration law. He shows that counties with stronger ties to public official associations, such as the National Sheriff’s Association and the Major County Sheriffs of America, were more likely to adopt identical 287(g) agreements, devote more jail space to ICE detainees, and comply with ICE detainer requests at higher rates. The issue also presents empirical analyses of the consequences of the U.S. deportation system. Articles by Youngjin Stephanie Hong and colleagues, Cora Bennett and colleagues, and J. Jacob Kirksey and Carolyn Sattin-Bajaj link deportation to reduced Head Start enrollment, lower K-12 test scores, and declines in college enrollment, respectively. The remaining articles turn to the aftermath of deportation. Erin R. Hamilton and colleagues show that between 2015 and 2020, 11,000 individuals were de facto deportees—family members who leave the country because another family member has been deported—in Mexico, with a disproportionate number being women and children. Further highlighting the importance of family, Ángel A. Escamilla García and Adriana M. Cerón analyze survey data from recently deported Central Americans and find those who left minor children in the U.S. were more likely to intend to remigrate to the U.S.

This issue of RSF sheds light on various dimensions of the increasingly punitive U.S. deportation system and the many ways it harms individuals and communities. In the current era of mass expansion of immigration law enforcement, it will be a valuable educational tool for students, faculty, policymakers, and many other stakeholders.

About the Author

CAITLIN PATLER is an associate professor of public policy, University of California, Berkeley.

BRADFORD JONES is a professor of political science, University of California, Davis.

CONTRIBUTORS: Cora Bennett, Adriana M. Cerón, Nicole Denier, Ángel A. Escamilla García, Angela S. García, Virginia Graves, Erin R. Hamilton, Youngjin Stephanie Hong, Bradford Jones, J. Jacob Kirksey, Agustina Laurito, Tina Law, Claudia Masferrer, Benjamin Meadows, Ashley N. Muchow, Caitlin Patler, Ian G. Peacock, Angelita Repetto, Carolyn Sattin-Bajaj, Carolina Valdivia, Marci Ybarra
 

RSF Journal
View Book Series
Sign Up For Our Mailing List
Apply For Funding

Elections are opportunities for citizens to choose who will make decisions for them and who will exert the power of the state over them. Pundits and scholars have contended that voting for a candidate based on their racial, ethnic, or gender identity is irrational and unreasonable and leads to suboptimal outcomes. Political scientist Ismail White will examine how racial, ethnic, and gender identity influence voting decisions and how an initial identity-driven political choice shapes subsequent voting decisions. He will conduct three survey experiments for his study.

Ensuring the political representation of ethnic and racial minorities is one of the oldest and most pressing challenges facing American democracy. However, simply electing racial and ethnic politicians does not guarantee that they will respond to the needs of their minority constituents. Sociologist Ellis Monk and political scientist René Rejon will examine the relationship between the racial and ethnic identity of African American, Asian American, and Latinx politicians and their support for legislation benefiting their minority constituents.

In a representative democracy, the ability to vote is a citizen’s primary tool for holding policymakers accountable. Women’s suffrage was an important step in resolving significant inequality in access to political power for women. However, we know little about whether policymakers adapted their behavior to account for women’s suffrage. Political scientists Michael Olson, Mirya Holman, and Christina Wolbrecht will examine how women’s enfranchisement impacted state policymakers’ behavior in the first half of the twentieth century.

The Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) Supreme Court decision recognized criminal defendants’ right to counsel in state courts. The administration of rights to counsel has largely been left to states and local governments and, as a result, many jurisdictions provide indigent defendants with assigned counsel—local private attorneys who work full time in the charging jurisdiction—as opposed to public defenders.

Typically, during economic crises, the federal government provides relief policies that disproportionately benefit White men. However, during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S., women were most impacted by changes in the economy and workforce. Political scientists Margaret Perez Brower and Jamila Michener will examine how the impacts of COVID-19 relief policies varied among working women of different racial and ethnic groups. They will conduct interviews for their study.