Despite increased attention to racial disparities in the justice system, we know little about how racial diversity on juries impacts jury deliberations. Political scientists Tali Mendelberg and Christopher Karpowitz will examine the influence of both White and non-White individuals on deliberations. They will analyze recordings and transcripts from mock juries for their study.
Despite widespread evidence of police brutality and misconduct, most White Americans have favorable views of the police. Political scientists Eunji Kim and Tyler Reny will examine the role of popular TV police dramas in shaping perceptions of police and the criminal justice system. They will analyze Nielsen ratings data, surveys, campaign advertisement data, and conduct experiments for their study.
The coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) has disrupted most areas of social and economic life, with disproportionate effects on service workers and low-income families. The negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic may substantially reduce the financial, economic, social, mental, and physical wellbeing of disadvantaged workers and their families. Economists Sarah Miller, Alex Bartik, and Eva Vivalt, political scientist David Broockman, and social worker and political scientist Elizabeth Rhodes will examine the immediate effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on low-income individuals and families.
Anger can be an important emotional force in politics. But do some groups cope differently when feeling angry about political issues? Drawing on social psychology theories, political scientists Jennifer Merolla, Antoine Banks, and Heather Hicks will examine how the coping strategies people pursue when confronted with political issues vary by race and gender. The researchers will run three online survey experiments specifically looking at the issue of employment discrimination.
American policing is commonly racist and repressive in nature. Calls for policing reform, even amidst mass protests, go largely unheeded. Existing literature on policing emphasize contemporary explanations to understand these issues such as the psychology of police officers and “tough on crime” voters and politicians. Political scientists Robert Mickey, Jacob M. Grumbach, and Daniel Ziblatt will examine historical factors that have contributed to development of current day policing.
Encounters between Black Americans and law enforcement highlight disparities in the nation’s criminal justice system. Racial differences in citizens’ interactions with the police fundamentally shape how Americans perceive high-profile instances of police use of force against Black Americans, including whether the officers’ actions were appropriate. Communications expert Joshua Pasek and political scientists Hakeem Jefferson and Fabian Neuner will examine the persisting racial divide in reactions to criminal justice encounters.
Books
Skin Color, Power, and Politics in America
Publication Date
6 in. × 9 in.
284 pages
ISBN
978-0-87154-637-1
About This Book
"Skin Color, Power, and Politics in America offers a compelling study examining the linkage between skin color and politics in the United States. Importantly, Mara Ostfeld and Nicole Yadon embark on a careful comparative analysis that examines the nuances and varied effects of skin color on the political attitudes of the three major ethnoracial groups in the United States."
—MARISA ABRAJANO, professor of political science, University of California, San Diego
"The conception of race as a social construct is not novel. What is novel and what makes Skin Color, Power, and Politics in America an essential read is its nuanced and deeper understanding—from measurement to meaning—of the multifaceted ways that people are stratified by skin shade both across and within broadly defined racial groups, and how that sorting links to power and politics."
—DARRICK HAMILTON, university professor and Henry Cohen Professor of Economics and Urban Policy, The New School
"Skin Color, Power, and Politics in America is a landmark achievement. It provides new and important insights about how skin tone shapes politics within and across ethnoracial categories. By looking beyond broad ethnoracial categories using novel data, Mara Ostfeld and Nicole Yadon carefully reveal the manifold pathways through which race, gender, color, and class influence political ideologies and ethnoracial politics in the United States. In so doing, Skin Color, Power, and Politics in America is an indispensable resource and a must-read for anyone interested in enriching their understanding of contemporary ethnoracial politics in the United States."
—ELLIS MONK, associate professor of sociology, Harvard University
A person’s skin color affects their life experiences including income, educational attainment, health outcomes, exposure to discrimination, interactions with the criminal justice system and one’s sense of ethnoracial group belonging. But, do these disparate experiences affect the relationship between skin color and political views? In Skin Color, Power, and Politics in America, political scientists Mara Ostfeld and Nicole Yadon explore the relationship between skin color and political views in the U.S. among Latino, Black, and White Americans. They examine how skin color influences an individual’s politics and whether a person’s political views influence how they assess their own skin color.
Ostfeld and Yadon surveyed over 1,300 people about their political views, including party affiliation, their opinions on welfare, and the importance of speaking English in the U.S. The authors created a matrix grounded in their “Roots of Race” framework, which predicts the relationship between skin color and political attitudes for each ethnoracial group based on the blurriness of the group’s boundaries and historical levels of privilege. They draw upon three distinct measures of skin color to conceptualize the relationship between skin color and political views: “Machine-Rated Skin Color,” measured with a light-reflectance meter; “Self-Assessed Skin Color,” using the Yadon-Ostfeld Skin Color Scale; and “Skin Color Discrepancy,” the difference between one’s Machine-Rated and Self-Assessed Skin Color.
Ostfeld and Yadon examine patterns that emerge among these measures, and their relationships with life experiences and political stances. Among Latinos, a group with relatively blurry group boundaries and low levels of historical privilege, the authors find a robust relationship between political views and Self-Assessed Skin Color. Latinos who overestimate the lightness of their skin color are more likely to hold conservative views on current racialized political issues, such as policing. Latinos who overestimate the darkness of their skin color, on the other hand, are more likely to hold liberal political views. As America’s major political parties remain divided on issues of race, this suggests that for Latinos, self-reported skin color is used as a means of aligning oneself with valued political coalitions.
African Americans, another group with low levels of historical privilege but with more clearly defined group boundaries, demonstrated no significant relationship between skin color and political attitudes. Thus, the lived experiences associated with being African American appeared to supersede the differences in life experiences due to skin color.
Whites, a group with more historical privilege and increasingly blurry group boundaries, showed a clear relationship between machine-assessed skin color and attitudes on political issues. Those with darker Machine-Rated Skin Color are more likely to hold conservative views, suggesting that they are responding to the threat of losing their privilege in a multicultural society.
At a time when the U.S. is both more diverse and politically divided, Skin Color, Power, and Politics in America is a timely account of the ways in which skin color and politics are intertwined.
MARA OSTFELD is an assistant research scientist at the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan.
NICOLE YADON is an assistant professor of political science at The Ohio State University.
RSF Journal
View Book Series
Sign Up For Our Mailing List
Apply For Funding
Data shows that African Americans have grown more disillusioned with racial progress over time. Additionally, since the 1970s, African Americans have left major cities in the Midwest, Northeast, and West to reside in metropolitan areas across the South. These two changes beg the question, to what extent does place shape Black’s racial progress attitudes? Political scientist Jessica Lynn Stewart will explore the relationship between geography, economic opportunity, and Black progress.
A notable feature of the federal government’s policy response to the COVID-19 pandemic was the use of unconditional cash transfers to address severe and widespread financial hardship. However, the lack of administrative infrastructure to distribute stimulus payments resulted in delays or failed delivery of federal cash transfers that disproportionately impacted resource-poor people, strengthening the fringe economy.