Skip to main content

Critical historical events leave a lasting impact on individuals’ developmental trajectories and there is reason to expect that young adults were particularly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Sociologists Megan Iantosca, Shelley Kimelberg, and Kristen Schultz Lee will examine how young adults, age 18 to 24, navigated the challenges of school and work during the COVID-19 pandemic and how their experiences impacted their understandings of career paths and social mobility.

Higher education trajectories are often interrupted or incomplete. Thirty percent of students “stop out” of college—taking breaks between enrollments—and 31-percent drop out and do not complete their degree within eight years of entering college. Sociologist Christina Ciocca Eller will examine the decision-making processes of students who start but do not finish their college degree, with a focus on reenrollment decisions. She will conduct 180 in-depth interviews with students who have some college but no credential for her study.

This grant is funded in part by the Spencer Foundation.

Many universities have adopted race-neutral admissions policies in response to the 2023 Supreme Court decision in the Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) cases. Sociologist Steven Dandaneau and education scholar Bryan Cook will examine the impact of the SFFA case on incoming class diversity and undergraduate admissions policies. They will collect and analyze new institutional data along with National Association for College Admission Counseling survey data on admissions policies and practices for their study.

Flexible work arrangements, including schedule control and remote work, have the potential to help parents better coordinate their work and family responsibilities. However, it is unclear how flexible work arrangements impact gender inequality. Sociologists Laura Adler and Emma Zang will investigate the extent to which flexible work arrangements affect gender inequality at home and at work.

High-profile cases of police violence have spurred renewed attention to the issue of police use and misuse of force.  Sociologist and criminologist David Kirk will will investigate whether police officers exposed to use of force by fellow officers are more likely to use force after their exposure. He will analyze 911 call data, demographic data, work assignment data, records on use of force from the Dallas Police Department, and American Community Survey data for his study. 

Parole candidates with similar characteristics can receive different outcomes. Prior research has shown a high degree of arbitrariness in California parole-release decisions. Sociologist AJ Alvero, legal scholar and economist Ryan Sakoda, legal scholar Kristen Bell, and data scientist Jake Searcy will use machine learning tools to better understand the decision-making process during parole proceedings in California. They will analyze transcripts from California parole-release hearings from 2007 through the present for their study.