
What Is Organized Charity?
About This Book
A 1910 pamphlet published by the Charity Organization Department of the Russell Sage Foundation explaining the work and aims of associated charities and their role in society.
A 1910 pamphlet published by the Charity Organization Department of the Russell Sage Foundation explaining the work and aims of associated charities and their role in society.
This project will use a field experiment to determine whether or not individuals value food differently when obtained from a food pantry versus a store. Data will be collected through a willingness to pay activity with food pantry clients as experiment participants.
Winner of the 2019 Viviana Zelizer Best Book Award from the Section of Economic Sociology of the American Sociological Association
“Monica Prasad begins with an unabashedly favorable view of European welfare states yet gives validity to conservative concerns over taxing production rather than consumption. Readers from all political suasions shouldn’t be deterred by whether they agree with theses like these. By reading Starving the Beast, they will garner much better understanding of the history, events, and forces surrounding the conversion of the Republican party to being the Santa Claus of tax cutting.”
—Eugene Steuerle, Institute Fellow and Richard B. Fisher Chair, The Urban Institute
“Republican commitment to tax cuts is one of most consequential and problematic features of modern American politics. Monica Prasad's fascinating book, Starving the Beast, offers a compelling new explanation of how this came to be.”
—Lane Kenworthy, professor of sociology and Yankelovich Chair in Social Thought University of California, San Diego
Since the Reagan Revolution of the early 1980s, Republicans have consistently championed tax cuts for individuals and businesses, regardless of whether the economy is booming or in recession or whether the federal budget is in surplus or deficit. In Starving the Beast, sociologist Monica Prasad uncovers the origins of the GOP’s relentless focus on tax cuts and shows how this is a uniquely American phenomenon.
Drawing on never-before seen archival documents, Prasad traces the history of the 1981 tax cut—the famous “supply side” tax cut, which became the cornerstone for the next several decades of Republican domestic economic policy. She demonstrates that the main impetus behind this tax cut was not business group pressure, racial animus, or a belief that tax cuts would pay for themselves.
Rather, the tax cut emerged because in America--unlike in the rest of the advanced industrial world—progressive policies are not embedded within a larger political economy that is favorable to business. Since the end of World War II, many European nations have combined strong social protections with policies to stimulate economic growth such as lower taxes on capital and less regulation on businesses than in the United State. Meanwhile, the United States emerged from World War II with high taxes on capital and some of the strongest regulations on business in the advanced industrial world. This adversarial political economy could not survive the economic crisis of the 1970s.
Starving the Beast suggests that taking inspiration from the European model of progressive policies embedded in market-promoting political economy could serve to build an American economy that works better for all.
MONICA PRASAD is professor of sociology and faculty fellow in the Institute for Policy Research at Northwestern University.
About two-thirds of the 11 million undocumented immigrants living in the U.S. have been here for a decade or more. Most are employed, have U.S.-born children and participate in the economic and social life of their communities. In industries such as agriculture, construction, housekeeping, and food services, undocumented workers represent a significant share of the labor force. The number of undocumented immigrants grew substantially during the 1990s and through 2006, but has since stabilized.
Researchers and policy makers are concerned about recent labor market changes that have reduced earnings, employment stability, and the ability to make a gainful living for lower-skill workers. The U.S. assists these workers through the unemployment insurance (UI) and workforce development systems, but only a small fraction of low-wage workers use a large fraction of those benefits. The success or failure of these efforts to reintegrate marginal workers into stable, gainful employment has important consequences for poverty, inequality, and the future of the social safety net.
Despite decades of progress for women, a significant gender earnings gap of 20% on average in the U.S. still exists. The gender earnings gap changes across the life cycle, starting low after education is completed and widening with family formation, particularly for those with more education. Recent research documents that the earnings gap narrows after cohorts are in their late 40s, with women born since the mid-1950s more likely to remain in the labor force into their 60s and even in their 70s.
Minimum wage policies have figured prominently in recent policy debates at the federal, state and local levels. Even though nearly three decades have passed since the advent of “new minimum wage research,” the effect of minimum wage increases on the labor market remains a controversial topic. Some studies find that moderate minimum wage increases have relatively low impacts on overall job opportunities for affected workers.
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) includes many provisions that expand health insurance coverage for women of reproductive age (15-44). By lowering financial barriers to reproductive services, these provisions may affect a woman’s decision to have a child, or prevent an unwanted pregnancy. They may also affect the demographic and socioeconomic composition of women with a recent birth.
This history covers the first forty years of Russell Sage Foundation's efforts toward "the improvement of social and living conditions in the United States of America." It records the things that were done, both as direct work and through grants, with considerable attention to the social situation which made them seen necessary or desirable. It is of value not only to those interested in the operation of the Russell Sage Foundation or other foundatons, but for the light it throws upon the origins and development of a wide variety of movements in the borad field of social science.
Over the past two decades, there has been a change in federal low-income housing policy, with a reduction in spending on large-scale public housing developments and an increase in vouchers that participants use to find private housing units. Starting in the early 2000s, the Housing Choice Voucher program (HCV)—commonly referred to as “Section 8”—became the primary form of low-income housing assistance. Those with vouchers find their own housing in the private market and pay landlords 30% of their income in rent.