The U.S. is projected to become a “majority-minority” nation, with White Americans shifting from comprising the majority of Americans to a minority by 2044. While much is known about how White Americans respond to this anticipated shift, little is known about how racial minority groups, particularly the biracial population, respond to information about growing racial diversity. Psychologist Analia Albuja will examine how narratives about the majority-minority shift that emphasize the growth of the biracial population influence biracial people’s identity and political preferences.

Inadequate nutrition can harm children’s health and development, including academic outcomes. A promising way to boost child nutrition is through home meal programs. Psychologists Rebecca Ryan, Ariel Kalil, and Anna Gassman-Pines, sociologist Pamela Herd, political scientist and public policy scholar Carolyn Barnes, and public policy scholar and behavioral scientist Elizabeth Linos will evaluate the effects of a home meal program on student academic outcomes in a low-income community. They will conduct a field experiment for their study.

In our deeply divided legal and political climate, it is important to identify interventions that can improve the academic and psychosocial outcomes of disadvantaged students while avoiding claims of reverse discrimination. Psychologists Emma Adam and Adriana Umaña-Taylor will evaluate how a universally targeted ethnic-racial identity intervention offered to high school first-year students impacts academic, psychological, and social outcomes.

Americans are living in an era of intense political polarization. Research has found that toxic partisanship is exacerbated by people’s overestimation of their own understanding of policies. Instilling intellectual humility—recognizing that one’s beliefs may be incorrect and being open to new information and perspectives—may help decrease political polarization. Psychologists Spike W.S.