Skip to main content
Cover image of the book Race/Class Conflict and Urban Financial Threat
Books

Race/Class Conflict and Urban Financial Threat

Author
Jennifer L. Hochschild
Paperback
$42.50
Add to Cart
Publication Date
6 in. × 9 in. 298 pages
ISBN
978-0-87154-906-8

About This Book

“Throughout her distinguished career as one of the nation’s preeminent social policy scholars, Jennifer Hochschild has drilled down to the bedrock of society to expose the race- and class-based inequalities that undergird much of American life. Now, in her latest study, Race/Class Conflict and Urban Financial Threat, she takes us through four fascinating case studies in the cities of New York, Atlanta, Los Angeles, and Chicago, to explore with precision exactly when, how, and why race and class do—or do not—drive the creation and implementation of major public policy programs, from policing to housing, education to retirement funding. The framework she devises for analyzing these programs not only helps to unlock an important public policy puzzle; it will go a long way toward helping a rising generation of urban leaders to be more aware in shaping a future that will be more just and inclusive for all.”
—HENRY LOUIS GATES JR., Alphonse Fletcher University Professor,Harvard University

“Jennifer Hochschild deserves our admiration for her commitment to combining a passion for justice with rigorous scholarship and a resolutely realistic view of how urban politics works. All these virtues are on display in Race/Class Conflict and Urban Financial Threat. Understanding the relationship between race and class conflicts is hard enough. But understanding both in the context of the financial challenges facing big cities is an enormous contribution to solving problems—and to being honest with each other about the stakes in some of our most divisive public policy battles.”
—E.J. DIONNE JR., W. Averell Harriman Chair and Senior Fellow, Governance Studies, The Brookings Institution

“Returning inventively to a prior generation’s attention to pluralism in urban settings, this book’s conceptually focused cases of policing, development, pensions, and education illuminate when, how, and why deeply inscribed inequalities of race and class shape policy creation, goals, and implementation. Stressing the importance of variations to substance and location, Race/Class Conflict and Urban Financial Threat powerfully shows that core hierarchies of inequality are not fixed, constant, or always dominant as causes.”
—IRA I. KATZNELSON, Ruggles Professor of Political Science and History,and deputy director, Columbia World Projects, Columbia University

Race and class inequality are at the crux of many policy disputes in American cities. But are they the only factors driving political discord? In Race/Class Conflict and Urban Financial Threat, political scientist Jennifer L. Hochschild examines significant policies in four major American cities to determine when race and class shape city politics, when they do not, and what additional forces have the power to shape urban policy choices.

Hochschild investigates the root causes of disputes in the arenas of policing, development, schooling, and budgeting. She finds that race and class are central to the Stop-Question-Frisk policing policy in New York City and the development of Atlanta’s Beltline. New York’s Stop-Question-Frisk policy was intended to fight crime and keep all New Yorkers safe. In practice, however, young Black and Latino men in low-income neighborhoods were disproportionately stopped by a predominantly White police force. The goal of the Atlanta Beltline, a redevelopment project that includes public parks, new housing, commercial development, and a robust public transit system, is to expand access around the city and keep working-class residents in the city by constructing affordable housing. Instead However, the construction completed thus far has also encouraged gentrification and displacement of, displaced poor, disproportionately Black residents, and has increased the wealth and power of both Black and White city elites.

However, Hochschild finds that race and class inequality are not central to all urban policy disputes. When investigating the issues of charter schools in Los Angeles and Chicago’s pension system she identifies a third driver: financial threat that feels existential to the policy and political actors. In Los Angeles, there is a battle between traditional public schools and independent charter schools. Increasingly, families with sufficient resources are moving out of L.A. to areas with better school districts. Traditional public schools and charter schools must fight for the remaining students and the funding that comes with them, since they fear that there There are not enough students to teach and not enough money to teach them. The school district risks school closures, layoffs, and pension deficits; in this context, race/class conflict fades into the background.

Chicago’s public sector pension debt is at least three times as large as the city’s annual budget and continues to grow. Policy actors agree that the pension system needs to be stably funded. Yet city leaders, fearful of upsetting constituents and jeopardizing their political careers, fail to implement policies strong enough to do so, except by penalizing new workers. Meaningful policy change to rectify the pension deficit continues to get kicked down the line for future policy actors to address. In this context also, race/class conflict fades into the background.

Race/Class Conflict and Urban Financial Threat is a compelling examination of the role that race, class, and political and fiscal threat play in shaping urban policy.

JENNIFER L. HOCHSCHILD is Henry LaBarre Jayne Professor of Government, Professor of African and African American studies, and Professor of Public Policy, Harvard University

RSF Journal
View Book Series
Sign Up For Our Mailing List
Apply For Funding

The decline of organized labor in the United States has been a renewed topic of interest in recent years. Yet, little is known about the places and groups of people impacted by union decline. Economist Zachary Schaller will create a city-level dataset on National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) representation elections (1963-2022) to examine where unions declined, who experienced the decline, and how it has affected labor market outcomes. He will pull data from Farber and Western (2001), Holmes (2006), Lee and Mas (2012), and the NLRB to generate the dataset.

Childcare is a major expense faced by families with children in the United States. However, the Supplemental Poverty Measure – the current approach for measuring poverty rates – inadequately calculates families’ needs and resources. Sociologist Christopher Wimer, public policy scholar Jane Waldfogel, and economist Robert Hartley will create and estimate a childcare-inclusive poverty measure that reflects the recommendations of the National Academy of Sciences’ 2023 report on improvements to the measurement of poverty.

Policies that facilitate the relocation of low-income households to high-opportunity areas – areas with more favorable economic, educational, and health outcomes – can reduce inequities in these outcomes. However, demand-side housing policies, such as vouchers, face supply-side barriers, such as the scarcity of affordable united and discrimination against families using vouchers.

Companies are increasingly outsourcing work instead of employing workers directly. Economists Gorkem Bostanci, Harun Alp, and Sergio Villalvazo will investigate causes for the increase in outsourcing, how outsourcing impacts labor measurements, such as productivity and job creation, and how outsourcing impacts businesses’ ability to adapt to changing economic conditions. They will analyze data from Federal Reserve Board reports, COMPUSTAT, the Annual Survey of Manufacturers, the Services Annual Survey, and the Longitudinal Business Database for their study.

Only one-third of displaced workers receive Unemployment Insurance (UI) benefits, with an even lower take-up rate among lower income individuals and minorities. One explanation for the low UI take-up rate is the complexity of its rules and application process. Economists Elira Kuka, Adam Isen, and Bryan Stuart will examine whether providing individuals with information and assistance in applying for UI increases benefit receipt. They will conduct a randomized controlled trial for their study.

The labor market shows persistently high pay disparities between Black and White workers, even when taking into account characteristics such as education, experience, and state of residence. Due, in part, to data limitations, there has not been a systematic analysis of the role employers play in explaining the racial earnings gap. Economist Itzik Fadlon will collaborate with Dr. Briana Sullivan of the U.S. Census Bureau to investigate the extent to which firms’ employment and pay practices and local labor market opportunities affect the Black-White earnings gap.

Much of the literature on redlining – the systematic denial of mortgage loans to individuals in Black neighborhoods – focuses on the Home Owners Loan Corporation (HOLC) and its residential security maps. Less is known about how the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) affected the racial geography of cities, even though some limited evidence suggests FHA ratings played a more important role than the HOLC.

Recent research has found that much of the gender pay gap emerges immediately following parenthood and persists throughout a parent’s career. However, the mechanisms underlying the parental gender pay gap are still poorly understood. Economists Brenden Timpe and Daniel Tannenbaum will investigate the role that company’s policies and practices play in persistence of the parental gender pay gap. They will analyze Census data, Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics data, American Community Survey data, and IRS data for their study.

Cover image of the book Where the Hood At?
Books

Where the Hood At?

Fifty Years of Change in Black Neighborhoods
Author
Michael C. Lens
Paperback
$45.00
Add to Cart
Publication Date
6 in. × 9 in. 306 pages
ISBN
978-0-87154-818-4

About This Book

“Michael Lens provides an unprecedented systematic overview of economic and social conditions in Black neighborhoods for the past half century. By moving beyond the pathos narrative that has characterized much of the scholarship on Black neighborhoods, Where the Hood At? will help us to understand the Black neighborhood in all its complexity and diversity. Where the Hood At? is a must-read for students of neighborhoods, urban planners and policymakers, and the Black experience.”
—LANCE FREEMAN, James W. Effron University Professor of City and Regional Planning and Sociology, University of Pennsylvania

Where the Hood At? describes in impressively comprehensive terms how Black neighborhoods in America have evolved over the last half century. Rigorous statistical documentation is clothed with an accessible writing style. This is a welcome study addressing a critical gap in scholarship related to racial segregation, neighborhood effects, and ethnographies of place. It reminds us why Black neighborhoods, not just individuals, are an important locus for analyzing issues of racial equity.”
—GEORGE C. GALSTER, Clarence Hilberry Professor of Urban Affairs and Distinguished Professor, emeritus, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Wayne State University

“Michael Lens has produced a comprehensive profile that describes the trajectory of the Black neighborhood in American cities over five decades. It is a much-needed and authoritative addition to our understanding of the Black neighborhood in American cities. Lens’s work provides ample fodder for policy debates ranging from integration and gentrification to the relative importance of place-based policymaking. We will be relying on Lens’s analysis of the Black neighborhood for a long time to come. Where the Hood At? challenges our assumptions about Black neighborhoods in American cities and their paths over the past fifty years. Just as importantly, the comprehensiveness of Lens’s analysis provides a clear and robust foundation for thinking about the future of these neighborhoods.”
—EDWARD GOETZ, professor and director, Center for Urban and Regional Affairs, Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota

Substantial gaps exist between Black Americans and other racial and ethnic groups in the U.S., most glaringly Whites, across virtually all quality-of-life indicators. Despite strong evidence that neighborhood residence affects life outcomes, we lack a comprehensive picture of Black neighborhood conditions and how they have changed over time. In Where the Hood At? urban planning and public policy scholar Michael C. Lens examines the characteristics and trajectories of Black neighborhoods across the U.S. over the fifty years since the Fair Housing Act.

Hip hop music was born out of Black neighborhoods in the 1970s and has evolved alongside them. In Where the Hood At? Lens uses rap’s growth and influence across the country to frame discussions about the development and conditions of Black neighborhoods. Lens finds that social and economic improvement in Black neighborhoods since the 1970s has been slow. However, how well Black neighborhoods are doing varies substantially by region. Overall, Black neighborhoods in the South are doing well and growing quickly. Black neighborhoods in the Midwest and the Rust Belt, on the other hand, are particularly disadvantaged. The welfare of Black neighborhoods is related not only to factors within neighborhoods, such as the unemployment rate, but also to characteristics of the larger metropolitan area, such as overall income inequality. Lens finds that while gentrification is increasingly prevalent, it is growing slowly, and is not
as pressing an issue as public discourse would make it seem. Instead, concentrated disadvantage is by far the most common and pressing problem in Black neighborhoods.

Lens argues that Black neighborhoods represent urban America’s greatest policy failures, and that recent housing policies have only had mild success. He provides several suggestions for policies with the goalof uplifting Black neighborhoods. One radical proposal is enacting policies and programs, such as tax breaks for entrepreneurs or other small business owners, that would encourage Black Americans to move backto the South. Black Americans migrating South would have a better chance at moving to an advantaged Black neighborhood as improving neighborhood location is higher when moving across regions. It would also help Black Americans expand their political and economic power. He also suggests a regional focus for economic development policies, particularly in the Midwest where Black neighborhoods are struggling the most. He also calls for building more affordable housing in Black suburbs. Black poverty is lower in suburbs than in central cities, so increasing housing in Black suburbs would allow Black households to relocate to more advantaged neighborhoods, which research has shown leads to improved life outcomes.

Where the Hood At? is a remarkable and comprehensive account of Black neighborhoods that helps us to better understand the places and conditions that allow them flourish or impedes their advancement.

MICHAEL C. LENS is a professor in the Luskin School of Public Affairs, departments of urban planning and public policy, University of California, Los Angeles.

RSF Journal
View Book Series
Sign Up For Our Mailing List
Apply For Funding