American Friends in France, 1917–1919 is the fifth of a series of occasional papers under the editorship of Donald S. Howard. Topics include organization and personnel, health and child care, house building, education, relief, and agricultural reconstruction.

Problems Involved in Administering Relief Abroad contains excerpts from an address by Clarence E. Pickett delivered before the School of Training in International Administration of Columbia University on November 19, 1942.

RUFUS M. JONES was editor of Friends Review and taught philosophy for forty years at Haverford College.

CLARENCE E. PICKETT was executive secretary of American Friends Service Committee.

DONALD S. HOWARD was assistant director of the Charity Organization Department of the Russell Sage Foundation.

American Aid to Germany, 1918–1925 is the fourth of a series of occasional papers under the editorship of Donald S. Howard. It contains excerpts from the book America and Germany, 1918–1925, by Sidney Brooks. Topics include conditions in Germany after World War I, transport and finance problems, the child-feeding program administered by the American Friends Service Committee, and clothing distribution by the Friends.

The Long Mile Beyond Berlin is excerpted from an address by Shelby M. Harrison before the New York Academy of Public Education on November 19, 1942. It discusses the tasks of relief and reconstruction that will face the United States after the current war.

SIDNEY BROOKS was the author of America and Germany, 1918–1925 (Macmillan, 1925).

SHELBY M. HARRISON was general director of the Russell Sage Foundation.

DONALD S. HOWARD was assistant director of the Charity Organization Department of the Russell Sage Foundation.

This booklet outlines the social work of the state of Florida. Among the topics discussed are war activities, care of soldiers and their families, food conservation, education in patriotism, administration of boards and institutions, the public health service, the prison system, infant mortality, child labor, recreation, public education, and care of the poor.

HASTINGS H. HART was the director of the Department of Child-Helping at the Russell Sage Foundation.

CLARENCE L. STONAKER was a staff member of the State Charities Aid and Prison Reform Association of New Jersey.

This booklet provides general principles for charity work. It discusses lack of male support, disability, children, volunteer visitors, churches, city aid, new applications, pensions, budgets, loans, pauperizing, and prevention.

FREDERIC ALMY was secretary of the Buffalo Charity Organization.  

This booklet examines transportation as a form of charitable aid, its effects on recipients, and better ways of helping.

In this booklet, Mary E. Richmond discusses the arguments for and against mothers’ pensions. She maintains that policies legislating that mothers stay home with their children may defend motherhood at the expense of mothers.

MARY E. RICHMOND was the director of the Charity Organization Department of the Russell Sage Foundation.  

"The elite-level battle over the Affordable Care Act has consumed a decade, the ACA has transformed millions of lives—mostly for the better—and yet Daniel Hopkins’s brilliant new book, Stable Condition, shows that all this has barely moved a polarized public. What does this ‘stable condition’ mean for politicalscience and policymaking alike? Read this fascinating book to find out."
—JACOB S. HACKER, Stanley B. Resor Professor of Political Science, Yale University

The Affordable Care Act (ACA), the sweeping health care reform enacted by the Obama Administration in 2010, continues to be a contentious policy at the center of highly polarized political debates. Both before and after the law’s passage, political elites on both sides of the issue attempted to sway public opinion through two traditional approaches: messaging and policymaking itself.  They operated under the assumption that the public’s personal experiences toward the law would make them more favorable. Yet these tried-and-true methods have had limited influence on public attitudes toward the ACA. Public opinion towards the ACA remained stable from 2010 to 2016, with more Americans opposing the law than supporting it. It was only after Donald Trump was elected in 2016 and the prospect of the law being repealed became a reality that public opinion swung in favor of the ACA. If traditional methods of influencing public opinion had little impact on attitudes towards the ACA, what did? In Stable Condition, political scientist Daniel J. Hopkins draws on survey data from 2009 to 2020 to assess how a variety of factors such as personal experience, political messaging, and partisanship did or did not affect public opinion on the ACA.

Hopkins finds that although personal experience with the ACA’s Medicaid expansion increased favorability among low-income Americans, it did not have a broader overall impact on public opinion. Personal experience with the Health Insurance Marketplace did not increase wider support for the ACA either. Due to the complex nature of the law, users of the Marketplace often did not realize they were benefiting from the ACA. Therefore, perceptions of the Marketplace were shaped by high-profile issues with the enrollment website and opposition to the individual mandate. These experiences ultimately offset one another, resulting in little discernable change in public opinion overall. Hopkins argues that political polarization was also responsible for elite’s limited influence and that public opinion on the ACA was largely determined by partisanship and political affiliation. Americans quickly aligned with their party’s stance on the law and were resistant to changing their beliefs despite the efforts of political elites.

Stable Condition is an illuminating examination of the limits of elites’ influence and the forces that shaped public opinion about the Affordable Care Act.

DANIEL J. HOPKINS is a professor of political science at University of Pennsylvania.