Skip to main content
Cover image of the book Changing Minds
Books

Changing Minds

Social Movements’ Cultural Impacts
Authors
Francesca Polletta
Edwin Amenta
Paperback
$37.50
Add to Cart
Publication Date
1 in. × 1 in. 298 pages
ISBN
978-0-87154-853-5

About This Book

“Many studies of social movement influence focus on policy and legislative victories. Changing Minds brilliantly widens the aperture, asking how movements change beliefs and popular culture. This enlightening work illuminates how notable movements of the twentieth century altered the topology of the possible by making resonant claims that transformed the wider contours of American life. Francesca Polletta and Edwin Amenta offer a refreshing view of how struggles gain prominence and provide a lens to understand our unsettled times.”
—WALTER W. POWELL, Jacks Family Professor of Education (and by courtesy) professor of sociology, organizational behavior, management science and engineering, and communication, Stanford University

“Drawing on two lifetimes of research on social movements, Francesca Polletta and Edwin Amenta join forces to illuminate the important interface between social movements and the diffusion of meanings that lead to social and cultural change. The abundant examples they provide from many corners of society help us make sense of the impact change agents can have on the public sphere. These accomplished sociologists also bring together what we know (and more) about various processes that help explain how public opinion changes. I strongly recommend Changing Minds as a most useful contribution that should be read widely.”
—MICHÈLE LAMONT, professor of sociology and of African and African American studies, and Robert I. Goldman Professor of European Studies, Harvard University

“It could be argued that the most consequential and enduring effects of social movements are cultural. And yet, social movement scholars have devoted comparatively little attention to theorizing these effects and the processes and factors that produce them. In Changing Minds, Francesca Polletta and Edwin Amenta have gone a long way toward addressing this lacuna.”
—DOUGLAS McADAM, Ray Lyman Wilbur Professor of Sociology, Stanford University

Social movements—organized efforts by relatively powerless people to change society—can result in legal and policy changes, such as laws protecting same-sex marriage and tax rebates for solar energy. However, movements also change people’s beliefs, values, and everyday behavior. Such changes may help bring about new policies or take place in the absence of new policy, yet we still know little about when and why they occur. In Changing Minds, sociologists Francesca Polletta and Edwin Amenta ask why movements have sometimes had fast and far-reaching cultural influence.

Polletta and Amenta examine the trajectories of U.S. social movements, including the old-age pension movements of the 1930s and 1940s, the Black rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s, the women’s movement of the 1970s, right-wing movements in the 1980s and 1990s, and the environmental movement up to the present, to determine when, why, and how social movements change culture. They find that influential movements are featured in the news, but not only in the news. Movement perspectives may appear also in opinion and commentary outlets, on television talk shows and dramas, in movies, stand-up comedy, and viral memes. Popular culture producers remake movement messages as they transmit them, sometimes in ways that make those messages compelling. For example, while the news largely ignored feminists’ challenge to inequality in the home, popular cultural outlets turned “liberation” into a resonant demand for women’s right to self-fulfillment outside the home and within it.  Widespread attention to the movement may lead people to change their minds individually. But more substantial change is likely when companies, schools, and other organizations outside government strive to get out in front of a newly legitimate issue, whether environmental sustainability or racial equity, by adopting movement-supportive norms and practices. Eventually, ideas associated with a movement may become a new common sense—though not always the ideas that the movement intended.

Throughout Changing Minds, Polletta and Amenta provide activists with strategies for getting their message heard and acted on. They suggest how movement actors can get into the news as political players or experts rather than lawbreakers or zealots. They show when it makes sense for activists to work with popular cultural producers and when they should create their own cultural outlets. They explain why the routes to cultural influence have changed and why urging people to take one easy step to save the planet can do more harm than good.

Changing Minds is a fascinating exploration of why and how some social movements have caused profound shifts in society.

FRANCESCA POLLETTA is Chancellor’s Professor of Sociology, University of California, Irvine

EDWIN AMENTA is Professor of Sociology, University of California, Irvine

RSF Journal
View Book Series
Sign Up For Our Mailing List
Apply For Funding
Cover image of the book The Returned
Books

The Returned

Former U.S. Migrants’ Lives in Mexico City
Authors
Claudia Masferrer
Erin R. Hamilton
Nicole Denier
Paperback
$37.50
Add to Cart
Publication Date
1 in. × 1 in. 228 pages
ISBN
978-0-87154-913-6

About This Book

“Written with a strong theoretical background and based in in-depth interviews, The Returned explores the complex and often contradictory experiences of return migration to Mexico. It reveals the mixed emotions of individuals who find themselves trapped between two worlds—one left behind with lost economic opportunities and the other not fully embraced. The authors illuminate the challenges and transformations that shape the lives of returnees, providing a nuanced perspective on the forces that drive and define migration within a complex policy framework.”
—MARÍA DOLORES PARÍS POMBO, profesora-investigadora, Departamento de Estudios Culturales, El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, Tijuana, B.C.

The Returned makes an important contribution to research on migration, both by focusing on the less researched reality of return migration, which has grown dramatically in recent decades, and by illuminating the struggles returnees face—the sense of being norteado (‘disoriented’ is one translation) when they go to live in Mexico City. Claudia Masferrer, Erin R. Hamilton, and Nicole Denier expertly analyze the experience of deportees and de facto deportees (those who return to Mexico with a deported spouse or family member) and trace how return migration fits into the life course. An important book.”
—ROBERT COURTNEY SMITH, professor of sociology, CUNY Graduate Center and Baruch College

The Returned tells the story of a historic turning point in which more Mexicans come back from the United States than emigrate. Lively interviews reveal how families cope with binational separation, finding work, and starting over in Mexico City. This is a highly readable contribution to understanding return migration.”
—DAVID FITZGERALD, Gildred Chair in U.S.-Mexican Relations and professor of sociology, University of California San Diego

In the first two decades of the 21st century, more than two million Mexican migrants returned to Mexico from the United States. Between 2010 and 2020, the number of people who returned to Mexico was so large that, for the first time in at least fifty years, more people entered Mexico from the United States than entered the United States from Mexico. Many of these migrants were destined for urban areas, and we know little about how they fare after they return to cities. In The Returned, sociologists Claudia Masferrer, Erin R. Hamilton, and Nicole Denier examine the experiences of returned migrants in Mexico City, one of the largest metropolitan areas in the world.

Masferrer, Hamilton, and Denier draw on interviews with former U.S. migrants living in Mexico City to better understand the experience of return migration to urban areas. Each of the migrants they spoke with lived in the United States for long periods with noncitizen status during the last four decades. During this time, U.S. immigration policy became increasingly focused on restriction and enforcement, which made it difficult for migrants to safely move back and forth across the border for work or to visit family without documentation. The authors find that upon their return, migrants in Mexico City felt disoriented and lost and had difficulty adapting to a massive urban environment where there is little support for returnees. They struggled to translate their work experience from their time in the U.S. to find quality jobs. Additionally, many found their family lives upended as they reunited with or formed families in the U.S.. Some found themselves separated from family members still in the U.S. with no ability to legally visit them. Others brought their families back to Mexico, some of whom were U.S. citizens and had never been to Mexico before. They, too, struggled to adapt and integrate to life in Mexico City.

The authors use the experiences of return migrants to discuss policies and practices that would improve their lives and ease their reintegration. To help with the disorientation they experience, returnees proposed ongoing psychological support with mental health professionals who have knowledge and training in the social and legal issues that return migrants face. Return migrants also advocated for policies to enhance skill matching, job creation, and entrepreneurship, as many felt the occupational skills they developed in the U.S. were undervalued in Mexico. To address family separation, returnees argued for legal and policy reform to accommodate family reunification.

The Returned is an illuminating account of the difficulties faced by return migrants and their families in Mexico City.

CLAUDIA MASFERRER is an associate professor, Centre for Demographic, Urban, and Environmental Studies, El Colegio de México

ERIN R. HAMILTON is a professor of sociology, University of California, Davis

NICOLE DENIER is an associate professor, Department of Sociology, University of Alberta

RSF Journal
View Book Series
Sign Up For Our Mailing List
Apply For Funding

The youth vote played a crucial role in Joe Biden becoming the first Democratic presidential candidate to win Arizona since 1996. Sociologists Nilda Flores-Gonzalez, Nathan D. Martin, Angela A. Gonzales, and Emir Estrada will build on research conducted from 2020-2023 as part of the RSF-funded Arizona Youth Identity Project to examine how young adults’ social and political identities develop over the 2024 presidential election. They will conduct two online surveys, a photovoice exercise, and in-depth interviews before and after the 2024 presidential election for their study.

Childcare is a major expense faced by families with children in the United States. However, the Supplemental Poverty Measure – the current approach for measuring poverty rates – inadequately calculates families’ needs and resources. Sociologist Christopher Wimer, public policy scholar Jane Waldfogel, and economist Robert Hartley will create and estimate a childcare-inclusive poverty measure that reflects the recommendations of the National Academy of Sciences’ 2023 report on improvements to the measurement of poverty.

Nearly half of the states in the U.S. have recently passed laws automating criminal record expungement. However, an unintended consequence of these laws is that non-citizens no longer have access to records they are required to produce in immigration proceedings when facing removal or seeking a change in legal status. Sociologist Sarah Lageson will investigate how court actors experience automated expungement policies and the impact of these policies on removal outcomes for non-citizens facing deportation.

Firm-level earning differences (i.e., the sorting of women and men between firms with different earnings premiums, due to prestige, market share, or other factors) is an understudied factor of the gender pay gap. Sociologist Thomas DiPrete will examine the extent to which firm-level earnings differences contribute to the gender wage gap. He will analyze restricted-access Census data, data from the Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics program, the Census Household Composition Key, and the American Community Survey for his study.

The polarization of the two major political parties in the U.S. has made voting harder for voters who are ideologically cross-pressured – those with liberal positions on some issues and conservative positions on others. Sociologists Delia Baldassarri and Stuart Perrett will examine how cross-pressured voters navigate the 2024 election. They will conduct survey experiments for their study.

Contact with the criminal justice system has implications for post-release outcomes, including unemployment, earnings, and health. Two nationally-representative longitudinal studies—the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 (NLSY79) and the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 (NLSY97) – have been essential to researchers. However, they currently do not differentiate between prison and jail incarceration.

Immigrants and children of immigrants comprise 13-percent of veterans. Yet very little has been written on their experiences in the military. Sociologist Amy Lutz will explore the experiences of immigrants and children of immigrants in the military and their motivations for joining the military. She will analyze in-depth interviews with immigrants and U.S.-born children of immigration who have served or are currently serving in the military.

While racial disparities in crime have been a central issue in criminological research, there has been a notable lack of attention given to the changing landscape of racial inequality in experiencing crime over time and its impact on different generations. Sociologist Yunmei (Iris) Lu will investigate the shifting Black-White gap in experiencing crime across generations. She will analyze data from the Monitoring the Future survey, the American Community Survey, the National Institute of Corrections, and the FBI for her study.