Most studies of U.S. immigrant and refugee integration overlook the experiences of adults who initially entered the United States as migrant and refugee children without parents and/or other relatives. This project seeks to “set the record straight” in scholarship about U.S. immigrant assimilation and integration by collecting and analyzing new interview data about the integration experiences of these adults.

After Prison
About This Book
“By bringing together two strands of social science research that are usually treated separately—those on youth transitions to adulthood and incarceration—and by providing careful new data analysis, David J. Harding and Heather M. Harris make an important contribution to our understanding of incarceration, race and poverty in America. Their nuanced portrait of the long-term outcomes observed among incarcerated youth is insightful, and generates major implicationsfor both research and policy.”
—HARRY J. HOLZER, John LaFarge Jr. SJ Professor of Public Policy, Georgetown University
The incarceration rate in the United States is the highest of any developed nation, with a prison population of approximately 2.3 million in 2016. Over 700,000 prisoners are released each year, and most face significant educational, economic, and social disadvantages. In After Prison, sociologist David Harding and criminologist Heather Harris provide a comprehensive account of young men’s experiences of reentry and reintegration in the era of mass incarceration. They focus on the unique challenges faced by 1,300 black and white youth aged 18 to 25 who were released from Michigan prisons in 2003, investigating the lives of those who achieved some measure of success after leaving prison as well as those who struggled with the challenges of creating new lives for themselves.
The transition to young adulthood typically includes school completion, full-time employment, leaving the childhood home, marriage, and childbearing, events that are disrupted by incarceration. While one quarter of the young men who participated in the study successfully transitioned into adulthood—achieving employment and residential independence and avoiding arrest and incarceration—the same number of young men remained deeply involved with the criminal justice system, spending on average four out of the seven years after their initial release re-incarcerated. Not surprisingly, whites are more likely to experience success after prison. The authors attribute this racial disparity to the increased stigma of criminal records for blacks, racial discrimination, and differing levels of social network support that connect whites to higher quality jobs. Black men earn less than white men, are more concentrated in industries characterized by low wages and job insecurity, and are less likely to remain employed once they have a job.
The authors demonstrate that families, social networks, neighborhoods, and labor market, educational, and criminal justice institutions can have a profound impact on young people’s lives. Their research indicates that residential stability is key to the transition to adulthood. Harding and Harris make the case for helping families, municipalities, and non-profit organizations provide formerly incarcerated young people access to long-term supportive housing and public housing. A remarkably large number of men in this study eventually enrolled in college, reflecting the growing recognition of college as a gateway to living wage work. But the young men in the study spent only brief spells in college, and the majority failed to earn degrees. They were most likely to enroll in community colleges, trade schools, and for-profit institutions, suggesting that interventions focused on these kinds of schools are more likely to be effective. The authors suggest that, in addition to helping students find employment, educational institutions can aid reentry efforts for the formerly incarcerated by providing supports like childcare and paid apprenticeships.
After Prison offers a set of targeted policy interventions to improve these young people’s chances: lifting restrictions on federal financial aid for education, encouraging criminal record sealing and expungement, and reducing the use of incarceration in response to technical parole violations. This book will be an important contribution to the fields of scholarly work on the criminal justice system and disconnected youth.
DAVID J. HARDING is professor of sociology at the University of California, Berkeley.
HEATHER M. HARRIS is a research fellow at the Public Policy Institute of California.
Download
RSF Journal
View Book Series
Sign Up For Our Mailing List
Apply For Funding
As artificial intelligence decision making systems become more common, policymakers must decide whether, where and how to use them in high-stakes settings. Building on an interdisciplinary initiative supported by the MacArthur Foundation, Professors Karen Levy, Solon Barocas, and Jon Kleinberg will conduct a qualitative study that focuses on the design and implementation of automated decision-making systems in two real-world settings: kidney allocation and civil discovery, a pre-trial procedure whereby parties to a lawsuit can obtain evidence from another party.
High-profile deaths of Blacks at the hands of police have thrust the issue of police violence and misconduct to the forefront of national debate. Effective policy responses to police misconduct are hindered by antiquated models of decision making that reduce the debate to “bad apples” vs. “bad organizations,” thereby overlooking the ways in which social networks impact police behaviors.
The original grant of $134,785 was supplemented by a second grant of $20,980.
Silva will conduct a large-scale experiment among a national sample of adults to improve our understanding of the determinants of “observed race,” or how people are racially classified by others. She will examine the role of status markers – such as a college degree or felony conviction – on observed race and how the effects of these status markers may be contingent on the presence or absence of well-established ethno-racial signals, such as racially distinctive names and/or faces.
Easley and Baker will develop a holistic measure of socioeconomic origin based on five variables – income, wealth, neighborhood characteristics, occupation, and education – and analyze the extent to which socioeconomic origin affects economic mobility. They will examine how using this holistic measure differs from using one measure in predicting mobility. They will also examine how region, residential segregation, and neighborhood bias impact differences in mobility across race.
Dondero and Altman will investigate how U.S. immigration policy and enforcement shape immigrant attachments to social, economic, and political institutions. By examining immigrant attachments to surveilling institutions such as the financial, healthcare, and public assistance systems, and non-surveilling institutions such as religious, civic, or service organizations they will test the hypothesis that restrictive policy and enforcement climates lead to less engagement with U.S. institutions.
Pagination
- Previous page
- Page 24
- Next page