“This carefully researched book documents that family background matters more in accounting for the academic success of children in the United States than for those in Canada, the United Kingdom, or Australia—all countries that have experienced similar economic shocks and have large immigrant populations. The authors make a compelling case that differences among the countries in social supports for families, labor market policies, and education policies all play roles in explaining this pattern. Too Many Children Left Behind will be sobering to readers in the United States, but it provides a source of hope that public policies matter in leveling the playing field and improving the life chances of children from low-income families.”

—RICHARD J. MURNANE, Thompson Research Professor, Harvard Graduate School of Education

“A devastating dismantling of the American Dream drawn from the most compelling data yet on children’s achievement during their early and formative years.”

—LEE ELLIOT MAJOR, chief executive, The Sutton Trust, and trustee, The Education Endowment Foundation

“It’s easy to think that the large achievement gap between rich and poor students in the United States is an immutable pattern, but the careful cross-national analysis in Too Many Children Left Behind suggests the opposite. The book’s detailed comparison of patterns of educational inequality in four countries demonstrates clearly that social and educational policies can help to equalize children’s opportunities for educational success.”

—SEAN F. REARDON, professor of poverty and inequality in education, Stanford University

The belief that with hard work and determination, all children have the opportunity to succeed in life is a cherished part of the American Dream. Yet, increased inequality in America has made that dream more difficult for many to obtain. In Too Many Children Left Behind, an international team of social scientists assesses how social mobility varies in the United States compared with Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Bruce Bradbury, Miles Corak, Jane Waldfogel, and Elizabeth Washbrook show that the academic achievement gap between disadvantaged American children and their more advantaged peers is far greater than in other wealthy countries, with serious consequences for their future life outcomes. With education the key to expanding opportunities for those born into low socioeconomic status families, Too Many Children Left Behind helps us better understand educational disparities and how to reduce them.

Analyzing data on 8,000 school children in the United States, the authors demonstrate that disadvantages that begin early in life have long lasting effects on academic performance. The social inequalities that children experience before they start school contribute to a large gap in test scores between low- and high-SES students later in life. Many children from low-SES backgrounds lack critical resources, including books, high-quality child care, and other goods and services that foster the stimulating environment necessary for cognitive development. The authors find that not only is a child’s academic success deeply tied to his or her family background, but that this class-based achievement gap does not narrow as the child proceeds through school.

The authors compare test score gaps from the United States with those from three other countries and find smaller achievement gaps and greater social mobility in all three, particularly in Canada. The wider availability of public resources for disadvantaged children in those countries facilitates the early child development that is fundamental for academic success. All three countries provide stronger social services than the United States, including universal health insurance, universal preschool, paid parental leave, and other supports. The authors conclude that the United States could narrow its achievement gap by adopting public policies that expand support for children in the form of tax credits, parenting programs, and pre-K.

With economic inequalities limiting the futures of millions of children, Too Many Children Left Behind is a timely study that uses global evidence to show how the United States can do more to level the playing field.

BRUCE BRADBURY is associate professor at the Social Policy Research Centre at the University of New South Wales, Australia.

MILES CORAK is professor of economics at the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Ottawa.

JANE WALDFOGEL is professor of social work and public affairs at the Columbia University School of Social Work and visiting professor at the Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion at the London School of Economics and Political Science.

ELIZABETH WASHBROOK is lecturer in Quantitative Methods for Education at the Graduate School of Education and a member of the Centre for Multilevel Modelling at the University of Bristol, United Kingdom.

• About the Book
• Table of Contents
• Resources

1

Introduction

Douglas Wolf

In this overview of the volume, Wolf outlines recent developments in long-term care policy and how research can help lead to a truly universal long-term care system in America.

Download PDF

2

Long-Term Care and Long-Term Family Caregivers: Outdated Assumptions, Future Opportunities

Carol Levine

Blending insights from her personal life and policy analysis, Carol Levine asks: How can public policy best support long-term family care?

Download PDF

3

The Rise and Fall of the Class Act: What Lessons Can We Learn?

Howard Gleckman

In an engaging history of the CLASS Act, Howard Gleckman examines why the landmark legislation failed and if it can be improved.

Download PDF

4

The CLASS Promise in the Context of American Long-Term Care Policy

Robert Hudson

Robert Hudson looks at the history of long-term care policy in America and why the issue has remained only marginally acknowledged or addressed.

Download PDF

5

Free Personal Care in Scotland, (Almost) 10 Years On

David Bell and Alison Bowes

After reviewing recent policy shifts in the United Kingdom, David Bell and Alison Bowes describe the costs and benefits of the provision of free personal care in Scotland.

Download PDF

6

Population Aging and Long-Term Care: The Scandinavian Case

Svein Olav Daatland

Svein Olav Daatland analyzes the Scandinavian approach to long-term care, with a particular emphasis on the Norwegian model.

Download PDF

7

Lessons on Long-Term Care from Germany and Japan

Mary Jo Gibson

Germany and Japan have both implemented mandatory social insurance programs to help provide long-term care. Mary Jo Gibson provides an in-depth analysis, along with possible lessons for American policymakers.

Download PDF

8

The Long-Term Care Workforce: From Accidental to Valued Profession

Robyn Stone

In her overview of the formal, paid long-term care workforce, Robyn I. Stone discusses current challenges and potential solutions to increase supply and quality.

Download PDF

9

The Perverse Public and Private Finances of Long-Term Care

Leonard Burman

How do Americans pay for long-term care? Leonard Burman explains the long-term care financing system, which he calls "dysfunctional."

Download PDF

10

It Takes Two to Tango: A Perspective on Public and Private Coverage for Long-Term Care

David Stevenson, Marc A. Cohen, Brian Burwell, and Eileen J. Tell

David Stevenson, Marc A. Cohen, Brian Burwell and Eileen J. Tell look at the private long-term care insurance market and ask: Why don’t more Americans purchase such insurance?

Download PDF

11

Long-Term Care Coverage for All: Getting There from Here

Nancy Folbre and Douglas Wolf

Editors Nancy Folbre and Douglas Wolf conclude the volume by discussing potential pathways to more comprehensive long-term care insurance.

Download PDF

Winner of the 2016 American Sociological Association’s Asia and Asian America Section Book Award

“In this well written and wide ranging book, Dina Okamoto puts forward a new theory describing the relationship between race, ethnicity, and assimilation among Asian Americans. This provocative racial boundary approach to understanding the identities and the incorporation of Asian Americans is a sophisticated and welcome contribution to the field. Using the case of Asian Americans it contributes to our understanding of the concepts and changing nature of race and ethnicity in general.”

—MARY C. WATERS, M.E. Zukerman Professor of Sociology, Harvard University

“Redefining Race redefines our understanding of the making of Asian America. By carefully articulating a theory of panethnicity as a process of shaping and shifting group boundaries, collecting data apposite to that theory, and designing demanding empirical tests, Okamoto expertly shows that Americans of diverse Asian backgrounds did not become panethnic overnight and ex nihilo as a passive response to state- constructed racial categories. Rather, Okamoto presents a vivid account of the accidents, opportunities, and contexts that fire up panethnic moments of collective action and douse them back into quiescence. Redefining Race is a major advancement and original contribution to the fields of immigrant incorporation, racial and ethnic formation, and Asian American studies.”

—TAEKU LEE, professor of political science and professor of law, University of California, Berkeley

“Through a sophisticated marshaling of theory and evidence from historical archives, interviews and social surveys, Dina Okamoto demonstrates how Americans of Japanese, Filipino, Korean, Chinese, Indian, Vietnamese, and other origins created an Asian American identity and Asian American institutions in the last quarter of the twentieth century. Despite disparate languages and conflicting histories, leaders of ethnic organizations defined by their nation of origin and others would strategically organize along panethnic lines when they found common interests rather than simply respond to the wider American society’s imposition of race. Okamoto’s Redefining Race is a new benchmark for understanding the social construction of ethnicity and ethnic identity.”

—EDWARD TELLES, professor of sociology, Princeton University

In 2012, the Pew Research Center issued a report that named Asian Americans as the “highest-income, best-educated, and fastest-growing racial group in the United States.” Despite this optimistic conclusion, over thirty Asian American advocacy groups challenged the findings, noting that the term “Asian American” is complicated. It includes a wide range of ethnicities, national origins, and languages, and encompasses groups that differ greatly in their economic and social status. In Redefining Race, sociologist Dina G. Okamoto traces the complex evolution of “Asian American” as a panethnic label and identity, emphasizing how it is a deliberate social achievement negotiated by group members, rather than an organic and inevitable process.

Drawing on original research and a series of interviews, Okamoto investigates how different Asian ethnic groups created this collective identity in the wake of the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s. Okamoto documents the social forces that encouraged the development of this panethnic identity. The racial segregation of Asians in similar occupations and industries, for example, produced a shared experience of racial discrimination, which led Asians of different national origins to develop shared interests and identities. By constructing a panethnic label and identity, ethnic group members created their own collective histories, and in the process challenged and redefined current notions of race.

The emergence of a panethnic racial identity also depended, somewhat paradoxically, on different groups organizing along distinct ethnic lines to gain recognition and rights from the larger society. According to Okamoto, ethnic organizations provided the foundation necessary to build solidarity within different Asian-origin communities. Leaders and community members who created inclusive narratives and advocated policies that benefited groups beyond their own moved their discrete ethnic organizations toward a panethnic model. For example, a number of ethnic-specific organizations in San Francisco expanded their services and programs to include other ethnic group members after their original constituencies dwindled in size or assimilated. A Laotian organization included refugees from different parts of Asia, a Japanese organization began to advocate for South Asian populations, and a Chinese organization opened its doors to Filipinos and Vietnamese. As Okamoto shows, the process of building ties between ethnic communities while also recognizing ethnic diversity is the hallmark of panethnicity.

Redefining Race is a groundbreaking analysis of the processes through which group boundaries are drawn and contested. In mapping the genesis of a panethnic Asian American identity, Okamoto illustrates the ways in which concepts of race continue to shape how ethnic and immigrant groups view themselves and organize for representation in the public arena.

DINA G. OKAMOTO is an associate professor of sociology and director of the Center for Research on Race and Ethnicity in Society at Indiana University.