The benefits associated with acquiring increased years of schooling, especially a college degree, are well-established. A prominent benefit is increased social mobility. But the opportunities for completing a college education are not equally distributed. Gaps in college entry and graduation have widened between students from low- and high-income families over recent decades. Less affluent students are also less likely to attend higher quality institutions, even when they have skills and abilities equal to those of more affluent students.
Co-funded with the MacArthur Foundation
Disparities in educational achievement and attainment between low- and high-income students have grown over the last four decades—an era of rising economic inequality. Some evidence has linked increased inequality and disparities in educational outcomes, but the mechanisms by which this occurs are much less clear.
Data from the Census Bureau show that the returns to a college education have increased over time and that by 2012, the gap in median annual earnings between households with a college degree and those with a high-school diploma was nearly $60,000. Despite this, increases in post-secondary attainment appear to have flat-lined, with low-income students particularly affected.
It has been well-documented that economic inequality has increased since the 1970s. The rise in income inequality is characterized by several different trends; these include an overall widening of the wage distribution during the 1980s, rising wage polarization since the early 1990s, and a substantial increase in the earnings share of the top 1%. Earnings have also become more unstable since the 1970s.
Co-funded with the W.K. Kellogg Foundation
There has been significant controversy about the effects of globalization in general and offshoring in particular. Proponents argue that it contributes to economic growth; critics, that it increases inequality by lowering the relative employment and wages of less-skilled workers.
Despite the narrowing of the gender gap in education in developed and to a certain extent in developing countries, and the fact that women account for nearly forty-seven percent of the global labor-force, women’s under-representation in the corporate, financial and legal sectors, especially at the top levels, has been widely documented. However, empirical evidence has mainly focused on gender inequality in labor-force participation and earnings.
The federal subminimum wage has been $2.13 for twenty-three years, and nineteen states currently follow the federal policy. Twenty-five states plus the District of Columbia have implemented subminimum floors above $2.13, but below their regular minimums, and seven states do not allow for a subminimum wage. At present, 40 percent of the U.S. workforce is located in states that pay $2.13; 43 percent work in states with subminimum wages from $2.23 to $7.00; and 41 percent of the workforce resides in no-tip credit states where the sub-wage is currently $7.25 to $9.32.
Jointly funded with the Washington Center for Equitable Growth
The relationship between national economic growth and the incomes of the vast majority of American households showed a profound U-turn around 1980. The conventional assumption that growth will be proportionately shared with all households was a reasonably good approximation for the 1940s-70s. But around 1980, a steadily expanding gap began to develop between productivity growth and worker compensation.
While the international offshoring of work in global supply chains has been the focus of much research over the last decade, its domestic counterpart has received relatively little scholarly attention. Despite evidence that substantial growth in domestic outsourcing has accompanied growth in offshore outsourcing, little is known about the extent of domestic contracting out and its implications for workers.
Universal Coverage of Long-Term Care in the United States
About This Book
As millions of baby boomers retire and age in the coming years, more American families will confront difficult choices about the long-term care of their loved ones. The swelling ranks of the disabled and elderly who need such support—including home care, adult day care, or a nursing home stay—must often interact with a strained, inequitable and expensive system. How will American society and policy adapt to this demographic transition?
In Universal Coverage of Long-Term Care in the United States, editors Nancy Folbre and Douglas Wolf and an acclaimed group of care researchers offers a much-needed assessment of current U.S. long-term care policies, the problems facing more comprehensive reform, and what can be learned from other countries facing similar care demands. After the high-profile suspension of the Obama Administration’s public long-term insurance program in 2011, this volume, the Foundation’s first free e-book, includes concrete suggestions for moving policy toward a more affordable and universal long-term care coverage in America.
Contributors
David Bell is a Professor of Economics in the Stirling Management School at the University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland.
Alison Bowes is a Professor in the School of Applied Social Science at the University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland.
Leonard Burman is the Daniel P. Moynihan Professor of Public Affairs in the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs of Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York.
Brian Burwell is Vice President for Community Living Systems at Thomson Reuters, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Marc A. Cohen is Chief Research and Development Officer of LifePlans, Inc., in Waltham, Massachusetts.
Svein Olav Daatland is Senior Researcher at NOVA/Norwegian Social Research, in Oslo, Norway.
Nancy Folbre is a Professor of Economics at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Mary Jo Gibson, formerly a Strategic Policy Adviser at AARP's Public Policy Institute, is a long-term care consultant.
Howard Gleckman is a Resident Fellow at The Urban Institute, where he is affiliated with both the Tax Policy Center and the Program on Retirement Policy.
Robert Hudson is Professor and Chair of Social Welfare Policy in Boston University’s School of Social Work.
Carol Levine is Director of the Families and Health Project at the United Hospital Fund, New York City.
David Stevenson is an Associate Professor of Health Policy in the Department of Health Care Policy at Harvard Medical School.
Robyn Stone is Executive Director of the Center for Applied Research and Senior Vice President of LeadingAge in Washington, D.C.
Eileen J. Tell is Senior Vice President of Univita (formerly the Long Term Care Group, Inc.), in Natick, Massachusetts.
Douglas Wolf is the Gerald B. Cramer Professor of Aging Studies and Director of the Center for Aging and Policy Studies at Syracuse
Universal Long Term Care Fact Sheet
Author Interviews
Robyn I. Stone discusses the long-term care workforce in America, its challenges and potential reforms for improvement. Read the Interview
Carol Levine discusses her personal experience as a family caregiver, and how policy must change to better support friends and family who offer unpaid care. Read the Interview
Douglas Wolf offers an overview of Universal Coverage and outlines possible reforms to improve the provision of long-term care in America. Read the Interview
RSF Journal
View Book Series
Sign Up For Our Mailing List
Apply For Funding
Pagination
- Previous page
- Page 62
- Next page