Skip to main content
Cover image of the book Not Well Advised
Books

Not Well Advised

Author
Peter Szanton
Publication Date
1981 pages
ISBN
978-0-87154-874-0

About This Book

From the preface: “This is a book about advice—especially advice to local public officials. It tries to determine why analyses and proposals offered to local public agencies by consultants of many kinds so often seem to be useless, or at least go unused. The book offers an answer to that question and then suggests a number of ground rules—for advisers, consumers of advice, and third-party funders of advice—that I believe would improve matters.”

Peter Szanton was president of the New York City–Rand Institute.

RSF Journal
View Book Series
Sign Up For Our Mailing List
Apply For Funding

Research shows that the federal government often privileges the interests of affluent Americans and businesses over those of ordinary Americans. When government enacts legislation that benefits the privileged, it often exacerbates existing economic inequalities. Why the wealthy and organized business groups are more likely to get their way from government remains unclear.

Cover image of the book Guide to Federal Funding for Social Scientists
Books

Guide to Federal Funding for Social Scientists

Consortium of Social Science Associations
Editor
Susan D. Quartes
Publication Date
400 pages
ISBN
978-0-87154-699-9

About This Book

Prepared by the Consortium of Social Science Associations (COSSA), a Washington advocacy group serving the major professional societies in the social and behavioral sciences.

The federal government is a major supporter of research in the social and behavioral sciences, but until now, no single, multidisciplinary directory has been available to guide researchers through the complexities of government funding in these fields.

COSSA’s inclusive Guide to Federal Funding describes over 300 federal programs in impressive detail, including funding priorities, application guidelines, and examples of funded research. Introductory essays describe the organization of social science funding and offer inside views of federal funding practices and contract research.

For anyone who needs to know the ins and outs of government funding in the social sciences and related fields, COSSA’s Guide will be an essential new research.

Contributors: David Jenness, William Morrill, Martin Duby, Felice J. Levine, Janet M. Cuca, Barbara A. Bailar, Steven R. Schlesinger, Janet L. Norwood, and Emerson J. Elliott

RSF Journal
View Book Series
Sign Up For Our Mailing List
Apply For Funding
Cover image of the book Food in the Social Order
Books

Food in the Social Order

Studies of Food and Festivities in Three American Communities
Editor
Mary Douglas
Publication Date
304 pages
ISBN
978-0-87154-210-6

About This Book

This book examines the sociocultural dynamics behind food – dynamics such as access to foods at the domestic level, the cultural influences training tastes, or the micro-politics that govern its distribution – through the lenses of three communities: the Oglala, a Southern community, and an Italian-American community. Contributors: Mary Douglas, William K. Powers, Marla M.N. Powers, Tony Larry Whitehead, Judith G. Goode, Karen Curtis, Janet Theophano, and Jonathan Gross.

Mary Douglas was Avalon Foundation chair in the humanities at Northwestern University.

RSF Journal
View Book Series
Sign Up For Our Mailing List
Apply For Funding

The murder of George Floyd in May 2020 sparked peaceful protests, riots, vandalism, vigils, and many other forms of activism across the U.S. and around the world. The unprecedented levels of participation by White Americans potentially represent a significant shift in intergroup relations among activists that might reflect changes in their attitudes, views of democracy, and organizational engagement. Sociologist Dana Fisher and political scientists Michael Heaney and Stella Rouse will investigate whether and how activists changed their views and participation over time.

The pandemic has wrought considerable hardship on racialized and immigrant groups. In Chicago, Black residents are dying of COVID-19 at five times the rate of Whites. Latinx groups have the highest rates of cases in Illinois, and Little Village—the Chicago neighborhood with the most cases is densely populated with many undocumented immigrants. While these groups have experienced very high rates of job loss, food insecurity, and inability to pay rent, many are excluded from government programs intended to ameliorate COVID-19’s effects.

Why and when do people act for the common good when they could free-ride instead? Current events spotlight this question. First, due to the Covid-19 pandemic, people have been asked to promote the collective good of public health by wearing masks and maintaining social distance. Why do some people oblige while others object? Second, protesters pursue the collective good of policy change.

The level of partisanship characterizing the U.S. pandemic response is unprecedented in recent politics. Under typical circumstances, public health crises raise the public’s anxiety, leading them to seek out information and to become more trusting in medical experts, but during the COVID-19 crisis, the information provided to the public by experts and the government has precipitated a partisan divide over the seriousness of the threat.

The COVID-19 crisis forced many states to postpone primary elections and/or hold them mostly by mail. Yet most Americans are not accustomed to voting by mail (VBM). Previous research suggests that barriers to voting by mail already exist for communities of color and immigrants, and data from elections held during the COVID-19 pandemic confirm that people of color return mail ballots at lower rates than whites.