"A wonderful compendium of everything you always wanted to know about trends in women's roles—both in and out of the home. It is a balanced and data-rich assessment of how far women have come and how far they still have to go." —Isabelle Sawhill, Urban Institute

"Based primarily on the 1990 population census, Balancing Act reports on the current situation of American women and temporal and cross-national comparisons. Meticulously and clearly presented, the information in this book highlights changing behaviors, such as the growing incidence of childbearing to older women, and unmarried women in general, and a higher ratio of women's earnings to men's. The authors' thoughtful analysis of these and other factors involved in women's fin de siècle 'balancing act' make this an indispensable reference book and valuable classroom resource."—Louise A. Tilly, Michael E. Gellert Professor of History and Sociology, The New School for Social Research

In Balancing Act, authors Daphne Spain and Suzanne Bianchi draw upon multiple census and survey sources to detail the shifting conditions under which women manage their roles as mothers, wives, and breadwinners. They chronicle the progress made in education—where female college enrollment now exceeds that of males—and the workforce, where women have entered a wider variety of occupations and are staying on the job longer, even after becoming wives and mothers. But despite progress, lower-paying service and clerical positions remain predominantly female, and although the salary gap between men and women has shrunk, women are still paid less. As women continue to establish a greater presence outside the home, many have delayed marriage and motherhood. Marked jumps in divorce and out-of-wedlock childbirth have given rise to significant numbers of female-headed households. Married women who work contribute more significantly than ever to the financial well-being of their families, yet evidence shows that they continue to perform most household chores.

Balancing Act focuses on how American women juggle the simultaneous demands of caregiving and wage earning, and compares their options to those of women in other countries. The United States is the only industrialized nation without policies to support working mothers and their families—most tellingly in the absence of subsidized childcare services. Many women are forced to work in less rewarding part-time or traditionally female jobs that allow easy exit and re-entry, and as a consequence poverty is the single greatest danger facing American women. As the authors show, the risk of poverty varies significantly by race and ethnicity, with African Americans—most of whose children live in mother-only families—the most adversely affected.

This volume contributes to the national dialogue about family policy, welfare reform, and responsibility for children by highlighting the pivotal roles women play at the intersection of family and work.

DAPHNE SPAIN is associate professor at the Department of Urban and Environmental Planning, University of Virginia.

SUZANNE M. BIANCHI is professor of sociology and faculty associate at the Center on Population, Gender, and Social Inequality, University of Maryland.

"Smith's research updates a long line of work that tries to understand the pattern of social supports in communities of concentrated poverty. She expands our understanding of the process by which acute deficits of human capital are converted into enduring disadvantage."
-CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY

"Lone Pursuit significantly advances our understanding of the employment woes of poor African Americans, This book provides new insights on the structural, cultural, and psychological factors that contribute to the high rate of joblessness among low-skilled blacks. I highly recommend it."
-WILLIAM JULIUS WILSON, Lewis P. and Linda L. Geyser University Professor, Harvard University

"Ever since the classic work by Granovetter, we have been aware of the powerful influence of social networks in labor market matching. But the question of what prompts a network tie to take the next step-to activate on behalf of a job seeker-has rarely been investigated. In this rich and engaging volume, Sandra Smith discovers the self-defeating rules of the game among poor African American job seekers who refrain from asking their network partners to help because they expect to be rejected. Hesitation by network partners combines with withdrawal on the part of the unemployed, leading to a devastating stalemate. Smith's work is sobering, insightful, and crucial in helping scholars under stand how the matching process breaks down for thousands of would be workers in the inner city."
-KATHERINE S. NEWMAN, Forbes '41 Professor of Sociology and Public Affairs, Princeton University

"Lone Pursuit is an elegantly written and substantively rich book about the many challenges faced by poor black job seekers. Deftly navigating between structural and cultural accounts of these disadvantages, the story that emerges from Professor Smith's careful fieldwork is a subtle tale of how moral judgments about the importance of work internal to the working class African American community reflect and reinforce the values of mainstream society, and how those judgments structure the job seeking of disad vantaged blacks. This work is required reading for any serious scholar of race and inequality."
-ROBERTO M. FERNANDEZ, William F. Pounds Professor of Management, MIT Sloan School of Management

"Lone Pursuit explains the seemingly inexplicable. Building on parallel arguments in Carol Stack's classic All Our Kin-that trust and distrust infuse relations among kin-Sandra Smith extends the interpersonal to the drama of the labor market as people search for jobs and try to find 'somebody' to trust. A deeply complex and original view of social capital that shows how family and friend networks fail to facilitate job search processes in poor black communities."
-MITCHELL DUNEIER, professor of sociology, Princeton University

Unemployment among black Americans is twice that of whites. Myriad theories have been put forward to explain the persistent employment gap between blacks and whites in the U.S. Structural theorists point to factors such as employer discrimination and the decline of urban manufacturing. Other researchers argue that African-American residents living in urban neighborhoods of concentrated poverty lack social networks that can connect them to employers. Still others believe that African-American culture fosters attitudes of defeatism and resistance to work. In Lone Pursuit, sociologist Sandra Susan Smith cuts through this thicket of competing explanations to examine the actual process of job searching in depth. Lone Pursuit reveals that unemployed African Americans living in the inner city are being let down by jobholding peers and government agencies who could help them find work, but choose not to.

Lone Pursuit is a pioneering ethnographic study of the experiences of low-skilled, black urban residents in Michigan as both jobseekers and jobholders. Smith surveyed 105 African-American men and women between the ages of 20 and 40, each of whom had no more than a high school diploma. She finds that mutual distrust thwarts cooperation between jobseekers and jobholders. Jobseekers do not lack social capital per se, but are often unable to make use of the network ties they have. Most jobholders express reluctance about referring their friends and relatives for jobs, fearful of jeopardizing their own reputations with employers. Rather than finding a culture of dependency, Smith discovered that her underprivileged subjects engage in a discourse of individualism. To justify denying assistance to their friends and relatives, jobholders characterize their unemployed peers as lacking in motivation and stress the importance of individual responsibility. As a result, many jobseekers, wary of being demeaned for their needy condition, hesitate to seek referrals from their peers. In a low-skill labor market where employers rely heavily on personal referrals, this go-it-alone approach is profoundly self-defeating. In her observations of a state job center, Smith finds similar distrust and non-cooperation between jobseekers and center staff members, who assume that young black men are unwilling to make an effort to find work. As private contractors hired by the state, the job center also seeks to meet performance quotas by screening out the riskiest prospects—black male and female jobseekers who face the biggest obstacles to employment and thus need the most help.

The problem of chronic black joblessness has resisted both the concerted efforts of policymakers and the proliferation of theories offered by researchers. By examining the roots of the African-American unemployment crisis from the vantage point of the everyday job-searching experiences of the urban poor, Lone Pursuit provides a novel answer to this decades-old puzzle.

SANDRA SUSAN SMITH is assistant professor of sociology at the University of California, Berkeley.

"Amply documented and methodologically precise, this volume provides a definitive socioeconomic assessment of earnings inequality and racial divisions in Atlanta."
- Choice

"The Atlanta Paradox is among the most important contributions of the past decade to our understanding of racial patterns of economic disadvantage in U.S. metropolitan regions. If we rank metropolitan regions by how much we understand about such matters, Atlanta just moved to the top!"
- RONALD F. FERGUSON, Harvard University

"This is an important and rigorous book. It offers a unique statistical snapshot of the South's leading city in the late 20th century-demonstrating the extent of the Atlanta paradox and offering explanations for its persistence."
- Southeastern Geographer

Despite the rapid creation of jobs in the greater Atlanta region, poverty in the city itself remains surprisingly high, and Atlanta's economic boom has yet to play a significant role in narrowing the gap between the suburban rich and the city poor. This book investigates the key factors underlying this paradox.

The authors show that the legacy of past residential segregation as well as the more recent phenomenon of urban sprawl both work against inner city blacks. Many remain concentrated near traditional black neighborhoods south of the city center and face prohibitive commuting distances now that jobs have migrated to outlying northern suburbs.

The book also presents some promising signs. Few whites still hold overt negative stereotypes of blacks, and both whites and blacks would prefer to live in more integrated neighborhoods. The emergence of a dynamic, black middle class and the success of many black-owned businesses in the area also give the authors reason to hope that racial inequality will not remain entrenched in a city where so much else has changed.

DAVID L. SJOQUIST is professor of economics in the Andrew Young School of Policy Studies at Georgia State University.

CONTRIBUTORS: Ronald H. Bayor, Irene Browne, Obie Clayton Jr., Nikki McIntyre Finlay, Christopher R. Geller, Gary Paul Green, Roger B. Hammer, Truman A. Hartshorn, Cynthia Lucas Hewitt, Keith R. Ihlanfeldt, Sahadeo Patram, Travis Patton, David L. Sjoquist, Mark A. Thompson, and Leann M. Tigges

A Volume in the Multi-City Study of Urban Inequality

A Generation of Change is an exceptional study of the nation's elderly, a population that has undergone profound changes in the years since World War II. As modern medicine extends the average life span and the baby boom generation begins to approach middle age, the number of older Americans is expected to more than double in the next century. Currently, 75 percent of U.S. health care expenditures go toward the elderly. But as national trends toward early retirement and low birthrate continue, an aging American population could face crises in meeting their financial and physical needs. According to Jacob S. Siegel in A Generation of Change, astute public planning must be informed by an understanding of the demographic, social, and economic characteristics of the older population, as it is today and as it will be in the coming years.

Siegel employs census and survey data from 1950 through the mid-1980s to describe a population constantly shifting in its ethnic and gender composition, geographic distribution, marital and living arrangements, health, employment, and economic status. Surprisingly, there is tremendous disparity in the quality of life among the elderly. Although their average poverty rate is below that of the general population, there are dramatic levels of poverty among older women, who are far more likely than men to live alone or in institutions. As the elderly progress from the "young old" to the "aged old"—those over 85—sharp differences emerge as income and employment decrease and degrees of chronic illness increase. In addition, residential location influences the quality of health care and public assistance available to the elderly, an effect that may account for the marked migration of older people to Florida and Arizona.

Siegel analyzes the full range of characteristics for this heterogenous population and, through comparisons with other age groups as well as with the elderly of the previous decades, portrays the crucial influence of social and economic conditions over the life course on the quality of later life. With our elderly population growing more numerous and long lived, accurate information about them is increasingly essential. A Generation of Change will serve as a valuable resource for policymakers seeking more effective solutions in critical areas such as housing, long-term health care, and the funding of Social Security and retirement programs.

JACOB S. SIEGEL is professor of demography at Georgetown University.

A Volume in the RSF Census Series

Includes many original contributions by an assembly of distinguished social scientists. They set forth the main features of a changing American society: how its organization for accomplishing major social change has evolved, and how its benefits and deficits are distributed among the various parts of the population. Theoretical developments in the social sciences and the vast impact of current events have contributed to a resurgence of interest in social change; in its causes, measurement, and possible prediction. These essays analyze what we know, and examine what we need to know in the study, prediction, and possible control of social change.

DR. ELEANOR BERNERT SHELDON and DR. WILBERT E. MOORE are both sociologists on the professional staff of the Russell Sage Foundation. They share a common background in demography and a common current interest in the measurement of large-scale structural change. Both have written extensively in various other sociological specialties, and participated in the ongoing activities of their common profession.

CONTRIBUTORS Daniel Bell, N.J. Demerath III, Beverly Duncan, Otis Dudley Duncan, Philip H. Ennis, William J. Goode, Stanley Lebergott, Ida C. Merriam, Joyce M. Mitchell, William C. Mitchell, Wilbert E. Moore, Iwao M. Moriyama, Milton Moss, A.W. Sametz, Conrad Taeuber.

"The authors' concerns resonate with current state and federal policy debates to reinstate more options for education and training. This book should encourage continuing examination of these policies and further research, development, and dissemination of policies that boost education outcomes."
-POLITICAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY

"Putting Poor People to Work is the best examination so far of 'work first,' the idea that poor individuals should simply go to work as the most direct way out of poverty .... In the end, their powerful analysis reveals a disturbing duality: at the same time that many policymakers and advocates are trumpeting the value of education, public policy has decided that the poorest among us deserve not education but mere palliatives."
-W. NORTON GRUBB, David Gardner Chair in Higher Education, University of California at Berkeley

"While the Clinton administration was promoting college attendance, welfare reform 'work first' requirements were simultaneously closing off college opportunities for the poor .... This book provides an important contribution to our understanding of this policy and its extensive implications for the poor, for community colleges, and for ideas about who gets educational opportunity in the United States."
-JAMES E. ROSENBAUM, professor of sociology, education, and social policy, Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University

"Putting Poor People to Work is an important book that describes in devastating detail how over the past decade, and almost without notice, poor women lost the fragile foothold they had gained onto the first rungs of the education ladder-access to college-that other Americans climb to economic security."
-JULIE STRAWN, senior policy analyst, Center for Law and Social Policy

Today, a college education is increasingly viewed as the gateway to the American Dream—a necessary prerequisite for social mobility. Yet recent policy reforms in the United States effectively steer former welfare recipients away from an education that could further their career prospects, forcing them directly into the workforce where they often find only low-paying jobs with little opportunity for growth. In Putting Poor People to Work, Kathleen Shaw, Sara Goldrick-Rab, Christopher Mazzeo, and Jerry A. Jacobs explore this troubling disconnect between the principles of “work-first” and “college for all.”

Using comprehensive interviews with government officials and sophisticated data from six states over a four year period, Putting Poor People to Work shows how recent changes in public policy have reduced the quantity and quality of education and training available to adults with low incomes. The authors analyze how two policies encouraging work—the federal welfare reform law of 1996 and the Workforce Investment Act of 1998—have made moving people off of public assistance as soon as possible, with little regard to their long-term career prospects, a government priority. Putting Poor People to Work shows that since the passage of these “work-first” laws, not only are fewer low-income individuals pursuing postsecondary education, but when they do, they are increasingly directed towards the most ineffective, short-term forms of training, rather than higher-quality college-level education. Moreover, the schools most able and ready to serve poor adults—the community colleges—are deterred by these policies from doing so.

Having a competitive, agile workforce that can compete with any in the world is a national priority. In a global economy where skills are paramount, that goal requires broad popular access to education and training. Putting Poor People to Work shows how current U.S. policy discourages poor Americans from seeking out a college education, stranding them in jobs with little potential for growth. This important new book makes a powerful argument for a shift in national priorities that would encourage the poor to embrace both work and education, rather than having to choose between the two.

KATHLEEN M. SHAW is chair of the Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies and associate professor of urban education at Temple University.

SARA GOLDRICK-RAB is assistant professor of educational policy studies and sociology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and faculty affiliate of the Wisconsin Center for the Advancement of Postsecondary Education.

CHRISTOPHER MAZZEO is a New York City–based independent consultant.

JERRY A. JACOBS is Merriam Term Professor of Sociology at the University of Pennsylvania and editor of the American Sociological Review.

An Institute for Research on Poverty Affiliated Book on Poverty and Public Policy

"The collection contains an incredibly rich amount of information, historical background, statistics, and ideas. It provides a significant contribution to our understanding of social reproduction, economic inequality, poverty, and the institutional mechanisms that shape wealth inequality. This book should be of interest to a broad audience."
- CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY

"Assets for the Poor makes an important contribution to the debate on how the wealth-creating opportunities available to upper- and middle- class Americans can be extended to low income families. Many critical issues of asset development are discussed in this important book, which will be an essential resource for anyone concerned about the twin problems of poverty and inequality in American society today."
-JAMES MIDGLEY, University of California, Berkeley

"For those already convinced of the importance of assets for poor families, this comprehensive compendium will add breadth and depth. For those wavering as to whether asset-based policies are a useful anti- poverty tool, this book is likely to win you over."
- JARED BERNSTEIN, Economic Policy Institute, Washington, D.C.

'Assets for the Poor is the scholarly treatise on America's 'third revolution,' the movement to democratize capitalism. While the first struggle overcame foreign tyranny and the second defeated slavery to usher in an extended era of civil rights, the coming revolution will be over economic justice... an effort to secure for all families a share in the fruits of our democracy."
-J. LARRY BROWN, Brandeis University

Over the past three decades, average household wealth in the United States has declined among all but the richest families, with a near 80 percent drop among the nation's poorest families. Although the national debate about inequality has focused on income, it is wealth—the private assets amassed and passed on within families—that provides the extra economic cushion needed to move beyond mere day-to-day survival. Assets for the Poor is the first full-scale investigation into the importance of family wealth and the need for policies to encourage asset-building among the poor.

Assets for the Poor shows how institutional mechanisms designed to encourage acquisition of capital and property favor middle-class and high-income families. For example, the aggregate value of home mortgage tax deductions far outweighs the dollar amount of the subsidies provided by Section 8 rental vouchers and public housing. Banking definitions of creditworthiness largely exclude minorities, and welfare rules have made it nearly impossible for single mothers to accumulate savings, let alone stocks or real estate. Due to persistent residential segregation, even those minority families who do own homes are often denied equal access to better schools and public services.

The research in this volume shows that the poor do make use of the assets they have. Cash gifts—although small in size—are frequent within families and often lead to such positive results as homebuying and debt reduction, while tangible assets such as tools and cars help increase employment prospects. Assets for the Poor examines policies such as Individual Development Account tax subsidies to reward financial savings among the poor, and more liberal credit rules to make borrowing easier and less costly. The contributors also offer thoughtful advice for bringing the poor into mainstream savings institutions and warn against developing asset building policies at the expense of existing safety net programs.

Asset-building for low-income families is a powerful idea that offers hope to families searching for a way out of poverty. Assets for the Poor challenges current thinking regarding poverty reduction policies and proposes a major shift in the way we think about families and how they make a better life.

THOMAS M. SHAPIRO is professor of sociology at Northeastern University.

EDWARD N. WOLFF is professor of economics at New York University.

CONTRIBUTORS: Richard V. Burkhauser, John Sibley Butler, Stacie Carney, Dalton Conley, Nancy A. Denton, Kathryn Edin, William G. Gale, Robert Haveman, Lelvin L. Oliver, Laurence S. Seidman, Thomas M. Shapiro, Michael Sherraden, Seymour Spilerman, Mark J. Stern, Robert Weathers, Mark O. Wilhelm, Edward N. Wolff

A Volume in the Ford Foundation Series on Asset Building

A Volume in the American Sociological Association’s Rose Series in Sociology

"Excellent for anyone studying social change and social movements, as well as for business leaders."
-CHOICE

"Beyond the Boycott draws on careful analysis of cases ranging across time and space from the operation of the Sullivan Principles in South Africa in the apartheid era to monitoring apparel sub-contractors in contemporary Guatemala to generate a provocative and original proposition on the effectiveness of transnational labor rights campaigns. Gay Seidman's well-argued thesis that transnational activists should focus less on corporations and 'workers' rights as human rights' and more on states and 'workers' rights as citizenship rights' is a fresh and stimulating addition to debates on transnational activism that is sure to have a lasting impact."
-PETER B. EVANS, University of California, Berkeley

"In this imaginative study, Gay Seidman explores the implications of the pivotal shift among labor advocates in the anti-globalizaiton movement from a traditional 'labor rights' discourse targeting the national state to a focus on human rights at the global level that relies on 'stateless regulation.' The three case studies reveal the potential of this new form of transnational labor activism, but also expose its limitations-most importantly the ways in which it constructs workers as victims rather than as agents of social transformation. No one else has examined the anti-sweatshop movement and corporate 'codes of conduct' with such a subtle comparative touch. Beyond the Boycott is a must read for anyone concerned about labor and globalization, for scholars and advocates alike."
-RUTH MILKMAN, UCLA

"In Beyond the Boycott, the eminent labor sociologist Gay Seidman provides an indispensable analysis of one of the most urgent questions of our time: How can labor rights be enforced in a global system now devoted to the rights of capital and commerce? By critically examining three major attempts to use the tools of 'stateless regulation,' Seidman makes a powerful argument that transnational activists should refocus their campaigns on restoring the promise of state institutions and democratic citizenship. This gem of a book will be required reading for anyone concerned about social justice in an era of globalization."
-MARK BARENBERG, Columbia University

As the world economy becomes increasingly integrated, companies can shift production to wherever wages are lowest and unions weakest. How can workers defend their rights in an era of mobile capital? With national governments forced to compete for foreign investment by rolling back legal protections for workers, fair trade advocates are enlisting consumers to put market pressure on companies to treat their workers fairly. In Beyond the Boycott, sociologist Gay Seidman asks whether this non-governmental approach can reverse the “race to the bottom” in global labor standards.

Beyond the Boycott examines three campaigns in which activists successfully used the threat of a consumer boycott to pressure companies to accept voluntary codes of conduct and independent monitoring of  work sites. The voluntary Sullivan Code required American corporations operating in apartheid-era South Africa to improve treatment of their workers;  in India, the Rugmark inspection team provides ‘social labels’ for  handknotted carpets made without child labor; and in Guatemala,  COVERCO monitors conditions in factories producing clothing under contract for major American brands. Seidman compares these cases to explore the ingredients of successful campaigns, as well as the inherent limitations facing voluntary monitoring schemes. Despite activists’ emphasis on educating individual consumers to support ethical companies, Seidman finds that, in practice, they have been most successful when they mobilized institutions—such as universities, churches, and shareholder organizations. Moreover, although activists tend to dismiss states’ capabilities, all three cases involved governmental threats of trade sanctions against companies and countries with poor labor records. Finally, Seidman  points to an intractable difficulty of independent workplace monitoring: since consumers rarely distinguish between monitoring schemes and labels, companies can hand pick monitoring organizations, selecting those with the lowest standards for working conditions and the least aggressive inspections. Transnational consumer movements can increase the bargaining power of the global workforce, Seidman argues, but they cannot replace national governments or local campaigns to expand the meaning of citizenship.

As trade and capital move across borders in growing volume and with greater speed, civil society and human rights movements are also becoming more global. Highly original and thought-provoking, Beyond the Boycott vividly depicts the contemporary movement to humanize globalization—its present and its possible future.

GAY W. SEIDMAN is professor of sociology at the University of Wisconsin, Madison.

"This volume is the first to examine how public policy aimed at education, income support, welfare, housing, civil rights, and employment may affect health. Since the existing strategy of devoting an increasing share of resources to medical care is at the point of diminishing returns and cannot be sustained in the long run, the approach promoted by this seminal collection deserves and is certain to receive growing attention."
-CHOICE

"In the next fifteen years, baby boomers will enter the elderly population and the number of people over sixty-five in the United States will have doubled, a crisis that will dramatically overwhelm our medical care system. Making Americans Healthier offers crucially important ideas about how we must deal with this challenge."
-S. LEONARD SYME, emeritus professor of epidemiology and community health, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley

"This is an absolute must-read book for anyone interested in how government policies can improve population health and reduce health disparities. Throughout most of the twentieth century, developed nations focused almost exclusively on the development of health care services, drugs and technology to cure acute illnesses and chronic disease. In contrast, the twenty-first century promises a much more deliberative effort to understand, endorse, and disseminate social and economic policy to promote health and prevent the onset of illness. Making Americans Healthier provides the keys for opening that prevention door by providing an up-to-date critique and thorough examination of how non-health policies targeted on social and economic problems have impacted population health."
-COLLEEN M. GROGAN, associate professor, School of Social Service Administration, and academic dean, Graduate Program in Health Administration and Policy, University of Chicago

The United States spends billions of dollars annually on social and economic policies aimed at improving the lives of its citizens, but the health consequences associated with these policies are rarely considered. In Making Americans Healthier, a group of multidisciplinary experts shows how social and economic policies seemingly unrelated to medical well-being have dramatic consequences for the health of the American people.

Most previous research concerning problems with health and healthcare in the United States has focused narrowly on issues of medical care and insurance coverage, but Making Americans Healthier demonstrates the important health consequences that policymakers overlook in traditional cost-benefit evaluations of social policy. The contributors examine six critical policy areas: civil rights, education, income support, employment, welfare, and neighborhood and housing. Among the important findings in this book, David Cutler and Adriana Lleras-Muney document the robust relationship between educational attainment and health, and estimate that the health benefits of education may exceed even the well-documented financial returns of education. Pamela Herd, James House, and Robert Schoeni discover notable health benefits associated with the Supplemental Security Income Program, which provides financial support for elderly and disabled Americans. George Kaplan, Nalini Ranjit, and Sarah Burgard document a large and unanticipated improvement in the health of African-American women following the enactment of civil rights legislation in the 1960s.

Making Americans Healthier presents ground-breaking evidence that the health impact of many social policies is substantial. The important findings in this book pave the way for promising new avenues for intervention and convincingly demonstrate that ultimately social and economic policy is health policy.
 

ROBERT F. SCHOENI is professor of public policy and economics, the University of Michigan.

JAMES S. HOUSE is Angus Campbell Collegiate Professor of Sociology and Survey Research, the University of Michigan.

GEORGE A. KAPLAN is the Thomas Francis Collegiate Professor of Public Health, the University of Michigan.

HAROLD POLLACK is associate professor of social service administration, University of Chicago.

CONTRIBUTORS: Marianne P. Bitler, Jeanne Brooks-Gunn, Sarah A. Burgard, Janet Currie, David M. Cutler, Rebecca C. Fauth, Irv Garfinkel. Ben B. Hansen, Pamela Herd, Hilary Hoynes, Daniel Keating, Jean Knab, Adriana Lleras-Muney, Sara McLanahan, Jeffrey D. Morenoff, Enrico Moretti, Theresa L. Osypuk, Richard H. Price,  Nalini Ranjit, Ana V. Diez Roux, Christopher J. Ruhm, Sharon Z. Simonton.

A Volume in the National Poverty Center Series on Poverty and Public Policy

Shows what happens when a specific social policy is tried out on an experimental basis prior to being enacted into law. By providing a trial of a variety of negative income tax plans carried out over a three-year period in four communities, the New Jersey-Pennsylvania Income Maintenance Experiment was designed to observe whether income maintenance would lead to reduced work effort on the part of those who received subsidies. This book evaluates the final project reports on the experiment issued by Mathematica, Inc. and the Institute for Research on Poverty at the University of Wisconsin.

PETER H. ROSSI is professor of sociology and director of the Social and Demographic Research Institute at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

KATHARINE C. LYALL is assistant professor of political economy and senior research associate at the Center for Metropolitan Planning and Research, Johns Hopkins University.

A publication in the Continuities in Evaluation Research series.