Skip to main content
Cover image of the book Reaching for a New Deal
Books

Reaching for a New Deal

Ambitious Governance, Economic Meltdown, and Polarized Politics in Obama's First Two Years
Editors
Theda Skocpol
Lawrence R. Jacobs
Paperback
$37.50
Add to Cart
Publication Date
6 in. × 9 in. 456 pages
ISBN
978-0-87154-855-9
Also Available From

About This Book

During his winning presidential campaign, Barack Obama promised to counter rising economic inequality and revitalize America’s middle-class through a series of wide-ranging reforms. His transformational agenda sought to ensure affordable healthcare; reform the nation’s schools and make college more affordable; promote clean and renewable energy; reform labor laws and immigration; and redistribute the tax burden from the middle class to wealthier citizens. The Wall Street crisis and economic downturn that erupted as Obama took office also put U.S. financial regulation on the agenda. By the middle of President Obama’s first term in office, he had succeeded in advancing major reforms by legislative and administrative means. But a sluggish economic recovery from the deep recession of 2009, accompanied by polarized politics and governmental deadlock in Washington, DC, have raised questions about how far Obama’s promised transformations can go. Reaching for a New Deal analyzes both the ambitious domestic policy of Obama’s first two years and the consequent political backlash—up to and including the 2010 midterm elections.

Reaching for a New Deal opens by assessing how the Obama administration overcame intense partisan struggles to achieve legislative victories in three areas—health care reform, federal higher education loans and grants, and financial regulation. Lawrence Jacobs and Theda Skocpol examine the landmark health care bill, signed into law in spring 2010, which extended affordable health benefits to millions of uninsured Americans after nearly 100 years of failed legislative attempts to do so. Suzanne Mettler explains how Obama succeeded in reorienting higher education policy by shifting loan administration from lenders to the federal government and extending generous tax tuition credits. Reaching for a New Deal also examines the domains in which Obama has used administrative action to further reforms in schools and labor law. The book concludes with examinations of three areas—energy, immigration, and taxes—where Obama’s efforts at legislative compromises made little headway.

Reaching for a New Deal combines probing analyses of Obama’s domestic policy achievements with a big picture look at his change-oriented presidency. The book uses struggles over policy changes as a window into the larger dynamics of American politics and situates the current political era in relation to earlier pivotal junctures in U.S. government and public policy. It offers invaluable lessons about unfolding political transformations in the United States.

THEDA SKOCPOL is Victor S. Thomas Professor of Government and Sociology at Harvard University.

LAWRENCE R. JACOBS is the Walter F. and Joan Mondale Chair for Political Studies and Director of the Center for the Study of Politics and Governance in the Hubert H. Humphrey Institute and Department of Political Science at the University of Minnesota.

CONTRIBUTORS:  Andrea Louise Campbell, Daniel Carpenter, Judith A. Layzer,  Lorraine M. McDonnell, Suzanne Mettler,  John D. Skrentny,  Dorian T. Warren.    

RSF Journal
View Book Series
Sign Up For Our Mailing List
Apply For Funding
Cover image of the book Epidemic City
Books

Epidemic City

The Politics of Public Health in New York
Author
James Colgrove
Paperback
$39.95
Add to Cart
Publication Date
6 in. × 9 in. 360 pages
ISBN
978-0-87154-063-8
Also Available From

About This Book

An insightful chronicle of the changing public health demands in New York City.

The first permanent Board of Health in the United States was created in response to a cholera outbreak in New York City in 1866. By the mid-twentieth century, thanks to landmark achievements in vaccinations, medical data collection, and community health, the NYC Department of Health had become the nation’s gold standard for public health. However, as the city’s population grew in number and diversity, the department struggled to balance its efforts between the treatment of diseases—such as AIDS, tuberculosis, and West Nile Virus—and the prevention of illness-causing factors like lead paint, heroin addiction, homelessness, smoking, and unhealthy foods. In Epidemic City, historian of public health James Colgrove chronicles the challenges faced by the health department since New York City’s mid-twentieth-century “peak” in public health provision. This insightful volume draws on archival research and oral histories to examine how the provision of public health has adapted to the competing demands of diverse public needs, public perceptions, and political pressure.

Epidemic City analyzes the perspectives and efforts of the people responsible for the city’s public health from the 1960s to the present—a time that brought new challenges, such as budget and staffing shortages, and new threats like bioterrorism. Faced with controversies such as needle exchange programs and AIDS reporting, the health department struggled to maintain a delicate balance between its primary focus on illness prevention and the need to ensure public and political support for its activities. In the past decade, after the 9/11 attacks and bioterrorism scares partially diverted public health efforts from illness prevention to threat response, Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Health Commissioner Thomas Frieden were still able to pass New York’s Clean Indoor Air Act restricting smoking and significant regulations on trans-fats used by restaurants. This legislation—preventative in nature much like the department’s original sanitary code—reflects a return to the nineteenth century roots of public health, when public health measures were often overtly paternalistic. The assertive laws conceived by Frieden and executed by Bloomberg demonstrate how far the mandate of public health can extend when backed by committed government officials.

Epidemic City provides a compelling historical analysis of the individuals and groups tasked with negotiating the fine line between public health and political considerations. By examining the department’s successes and failures during the ambitious social programs of the 1960s, the fiscal crisis of the 1970s, the struggles with poverty and homelessness in the 1980s and 1990s, and in the post-9/11 era, Epidemic City shows how the NYC Department of Health has defined the role and scope of public health services for the entire nation.

JAMES COLGROVE is associate professor in the Center for the History and Ethics of Public Health at Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health.

Read an interview with James Colgrove here.

RSF Journal
View Book Series
Sign Up For Our Mailing List
Apply For Funding

The literature on political socialization suggests that learning to participate politically begins early, before youth reach voting age, and that this process begins with family at home, and with peers at school. But what does political socialization entail for contemporary second-generation immigrant youth when, by most estimates, more than 40 percent of voting age Latinos and Asians are not U.S. citizens and, therefore, non-voters?

 

Household survey responses rates in the United States have been steadily declining for at least the last two decades. A similar decline in survey response can be observed in all wealthy countries, and is particularly high in areas with large numbers of single-parent households, families with young children, workers with long commutes, and high crime rates. Efforts to raise response rates have used monetary incentives or repetitive attempts to obtain completed interviews, but these strategies increase the costs of surveys and are often unsuccessful.

The long-running rise in economic inequality in the U.S. is sometimes framed as a threat that the poor will fall further and further behind the rest of society. But in fact, most of the increase in inequality has occurred at the top of the distribution, not the bottom—it is more a matter of the rich pulling away from everyone else rather than the poor falling behind.  And, within the high-income group, it is those at the very top who have made the biggest gains.

Since 2006, the last time Congress failed to pass comprehensive immigration reform, state and local authorities have increasingly taken immigration law and enforcement into their own hands. While these new regulations cover a broad spectrum of immigration reform, many are notable for their anti-immigrant leanings, including laws banning landlords from renting to undocumented immigrants and “English-only” ordinances.

Nearly a half century after the civil rights movement, race remains a significant predictor of income, wealth, employment, health, educational attainment, and a number of other social and economic outcomes. In all of these areas African Americans and other minorities lag behind whites, which poses serious issues not only for these group members but for the overall health of American democracy. While the existence of these racial disparities is well documented, the causes of their persistence remain a vexing puzzle.