“Legalized Inequalities makes a critical contribution to our understanding of how the state, legal system, and current regulatory structures make employment so uncertain for many vulnerable workers. It’s a powerfully written, accessible must-read for anyone interested in immigration, work, and race.”
—ADIA HARVEY WINGFIELD, assistant vice provost, professor of sociology, and Mary Tileston Hemenway Professor of Arts and Sciences, Washington University

“Legalized Inequalities is a landmark contribution to the study of law, labor, and migration—an unflinching exposé of how US legal regimes actively construct and sustain racialized precarity in the low-wage workplace. Drawing on over three hundred in-depth interviews with immigrant workers and fifty advocates across the New York metropolitan area, Kati L. Griffith, Shannon Gleeson, Darlène Dubuisson, and Patricia Campos-Medina reveal how labor and employment law, immigration policy, and the enduring legacies of slavery and colonialism converge to produce and legitimize workplace precarity. With interdisciplinary rigor and moral clarity, the authors illuminate the state’s central role—not as a passive bystander but as an architect of inequality—while foregrounding the quiet, creative, and sometimes collective ways workers assert dignity and resistance. This book is essential reading for scholars of labor, immigration, race, and social inequality, and for anyone committed to understanding how power operates in the contemporary American political economy.”
—DANIEL J. GALVIN, professor of political science, Northwestern University

Beyond unlivable wages and a lack of upward mobility, low-wage work in the United States is rife with danger and degrading treatment. Immigrants and people of color are overrepresented in these “bad jobs” and often feel as though they are unable to change their working conditions. In Legalized Inequalities, law scholar Kati L. Griffith, sociologist Shannon Gleeson, anthropologist Darlène Dubuisson, and political scientist Patricia Campos-Medina investigate the government’s role in perpetuating poor and dangerous work environments for low-wage immigrant workers of color.

Drawing on interviews with over three hundred low-wage Haitian and Central American workers and worker advocates, the authors reveal how U.S. policies produce and sustain job instability and insecurity. Contemporary U.S. labor and employment law, immigration policy, and enduring racial inequality work in tandem to keep workers’ wages low, lock them into substandard working conditions, and minimize opportunities for change. Regulations meant to protect workers are weak and underenforced, privileging employers over workers. At-will employment policies, which allow employers to terminate employees without cause, discourage workers from bargaining for better jobs or holding employers accountable for even the most egregious mistreatment. Federal immigration policy further disempowers workers by deputizing employers to act as immigration enforcement agents leading undocumented workers to believe they must endure maltreatment or risk deportation. Anti-immigrant sentiment—encouraged by U.S. policy—impacts workers across all status groups. Additionally, despite a proliferation of civil rights legislation, racial disparities remain in the workplace. Workers of color are often paid less, forced to complete more dangerous and demeaning tasks, and subjected to racial harassment.

While these workers face formidable barriers to fighting for their rights, they are not entirely powerless. Some low-wage workers filed formal complaints with government agencies. Others, on their own or collectively, confronted their employers to demand fair and dignified treatment. Some even quit in protest of their poor working conditions. The authors argue that reforming labor and employment law, immigration law, and civil rights law is necessary to reshape the low-wage workplace. They suggest increasing funding for workers’ rights enforcement agencies, removing the mandate for employers to verify a worker’s immigration status, and making it easier to prove that employment discrimination has occurred to help empower and protect low-wage immigrant workers of color.

Legalized Inequalities not only highlights the crushing consequences of U.S. policy on low-wage immigrant workers of color but showcases their resilience in the face of these obstacles.

"Conservatives in other countries have long supported universal child benefits as an important tool for tackling child poverty while encouraging work and family stability. American conservatives have been more skeptical, but, as Jane Waldfogel demonstrates with wide-ranging evidence, child benefits are one pro-family policy that deserves support across the political spectrum."
-JOSH McCABE, director of social policy, Niskanen Center

"In this well-researched and informative book, Jane Waldfogel examines the case for child benefits in the United States. Woven with evidence and history, and tackling head-on the trade-offs embedded in the policy debate, Child Benefits is exactly what we need for this moment."
-HILARY HOYNES, Chancellor's Professor of Economics and Public Policy, Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley

"If you're interested in child poverty and in issues and challenges that government benefits and programs for children now face, do not miss Child Benefits. It is full of keen insights, thoughtful and deeply informative discussions, and wisdom about where we as a nation should go from here. And it's written in a clear, nontechnical, and highly readable manner that should appeal to a broad audience, which the book very much deserves."
-ROBERT GREENSTEIN, visiting fellow in economic studies, The Brookings Institution, and founder and president emeritus, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

The United States has one of the highest child poverty rates among wealthy countries and stands out among its peers as the only country that does not offer a child benefit – regular payments from the government to most or all families with children, not conditioned on parental employment. During the temporary expansion of the Child Tax Credit (CTC) in 2021, the CTC functioned as a child benefit, and the child poverty rate fell to the lowest level ever recorded in the United States. Despite this decrease, the CTC expansion was not renewed. Concerns about enacting a child benefit include the cost, the possibility of misuse of money by parents, and how it might affect parental employment and fertility. In Child Benefits, social policy scholar Jane Waldfogel details the history and origins of child benefits around the world and comprehensively assesses how child benefits affect family spending, fertility, employment, child poverty, and child wellbeing to address such concerns and to determine the benefits of enacting such a policy permanently.

Drawing on research from peer countries in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development as well as the United States, Waldfogel shows that a child benefit would prevent poverty and hardship and protect children from deep poverty and income instability. The research is clear that families would spend the money from a child benefit on food, clothing, and other items for their children and that a child benefit would not have large negative impacts on parental employment or family decisions about fertility. It also shows that a child benefit would promote short- and longer-term child and family wellbeing. Child benefits have been shown to enhance opportunity and benefit society through healthier and better-educated young adults and stronger and more stable families. And rigorous benefit-cost analyses indicate that a child benefit, while costly, would more than pay for itself, yielding a large return on investment.

Waldfogel evaluates four current, major proposals for a child benefit and provides recommendations for a policy that would deliver the best outcomes for children and families and the best return on investment. She argues that such a policy would be more generous, not tied to parental employment or earnings, available to all parents but phased out for higher-income families, delivered in monthly payments through the tax system, and provided in addition to existing social programs.

Child Benefits provides fascinating insights on the history and impacts of child benefits and makes a clear and definitive argument for the establishment of a child benefit in the United States.

This booklet discusses what 1,038 U.S. cities are doing for the health of school children. The first part discusses medical inspection, including the history of medical inspection, administration, and kinds of medical inspection. The second part covers hygiene of the school room, including outdoor recesses, individual drinking cups and sanitary fountains, modern methods of dusting and sweeping, and instruction in alcohol, tobacco, tuberculosis, and first aid.

This booklet presents the report of the Committee on Lock-ups, Municipal and County Jails, of the American Prison Association on United States prisoners boarded out by the federal government. It discusses the origins of the boarding-out system, congressional action, three U.S. penitentiaries, federal reformatories, U.S. prisoners boarded out, the difficulties of reforming the county jail system, jail from the prisoner’s point of view, and suggestions for grand jury surveys of conditions under which federal prisoners are kept in county jails.

HASTINGS L. HART was the chairman of the committee of the American Prison Association and consultant in delinquency and penology at the Russell Sage Foundation.  

This booklet presents evidence indicating that social work salaries are too low for the development of social work as a profession. It includes diagrams presenting results of a study conducted by the Russell Sage Foundation that aimed to trace the course of salaries in social work over the period of rising prices and wages during and just after World War I and through the subsequent period until 1926.

RALPH G. HURLIN was director of the Department of Statistics of the Russell Sage Foundation.

This booklet reports on a study of children’s handwriting conducted by the Russell Sage foundation and presents the scale that the study produced. It discusses how the handwriting samples were obtained as well as how they were read and scored.

LEONARD P. AYRES was director of the Division of Education of the Russell Sage Foundation.

This article from The North American Review, though not published by the Russell Sage Foundation, was written by RSF’s founder, Margaret Olivia Sage, and thus may be of interest to scholars. The author argues that privileged women have a duty to help others and that recent changes in women’s education have expanded their minds, thus allowing them to make greater contributions to society.

MARGARET OLIVIA SAGE founded the Russell Sage Foundation in 1907.

This booklet presents a critique of two approaches to community center administration. In the first approach, a community center is run exclusively by the government. In the second approach, a community center is run exclusively by a private association. The author concludes that before cities can determine the best administrative method, more reliable data must be gathered.

CLARENCE ARTHUR PERRY was associate director of the Department of Recreation at the Russell Sage Foundation.  

This booklet presents the result of a study of play for children in institutions presented in a series of five conferences at the invitation of the State Board of Charities of New York. It discusses the function and value of play as well as requisites for play and the adaptation of play for various age groups.

ROBERT K. ATKINSON was a researcher who studied children’s institutions in the United States.

This article from The Psychological Clinic, reprinted in the same year as a booklet by the Russell Sage Foundation, discusses school overcrowding in the lower grades. It examines whether the schools are overcrowded with children who should have passed on to the upper grades and how much money is expended on these students each year.

LEONARD P. AYRES was director of the Division of Education at the Russell Sage Foundation.